Skip to main content

Donald Drummond Commission: Visions of Mike Harris

Don Drummond has sent a message that his Commission on Reform of the Public Services will put a hard squeeze on health care. A Toronto Star columnist reports that he said up to 25 per cent of it is wasteful, “so obviously that’s the kind of stuff you go after, that would be the least painful stuff.”

Speaking of public services more broadly Drummond added, “Somebody is going to have to do something, and it’s going to have to be fairly forceful. Hopefully, it will be strategic and intelligent, and it will minimize any kind of pain — and there likely will be some (pain) involved with it,” he says. “My guess is that come Oct. 7, somebody is going to be knocking on our door asking for ideas

While they are talking up another, more pleasant, post-election world, Liberal and PC spending plans after the election will require pretty draconian cuts to public services, so they may well rely on Drummond -- after the election --  to justify all the blood on the tracks. 

I'd like to believe that isn't already the (pretty cynical) plan -- but that's getting a lot harder.

The Mike Harris government squeezed health care spending  (actually cutting hospital spending) when it was first elected in the mid-1990s.  That led to disaster -- and so, after a few years, they switched directions and brought all the money back (and much more).  

Update 2:22 pm: Drummond is on a bit of a right wing tear this week.  Not satisfied with directing his fire to health care funding, he has also joined a call that opens the door to more health care privatization, as part of a panel report to the Canadian Medical Association.  

The panel report calls for consideration of "such mechanisms as user fees, franchises and various insurance schemes...These not only provide a portion of funding, they may help create the right incentives for a broader, more appropriate and more efficient system of supports."    The report also also calls for "a framework that allows a range of providers – public‐sector, private‐sector and non‐profit – to compete in carefully controlled conditions."  (Ingeniously, the authors intone: "This is not privatization".)

Here's a quote on the panel report from Drummond that bolsters the privatization of health care delivery (and the response to the panel report from Canadian Doctors for Medicare):  

Most people probably don't care if they go to a publicly or privately run clinic for a blood test, "as long as they can pull out their provincial (health) card and it's paid for publicly, and that's what we're saying," panel member Don Drummond of the school of policy studies at Queen's University in Kingston, Ont., told reporters....Critics said the panel's recommendations directly contradict the CMA's own principles around health reform as well as what it heard from Canadians in a series of town hall meetings across the country.  "Instead of leading us towards some thoughtful solutions based on evidence, they seem to be propounding things that we know don't work," said Dr. Bob Woollard of Canadian Doctors for Medicare. User fees systematically disadvantage patients who need the system most, he said. Competition could open the door to more private, for-profit care, he said, and "cherry picks the healthiest, wealthiest patients. Those who have complicated diseases — which most people do now — you want to shuffle them out the side door."

Bottom line: Drummond's post-election report on public services looks set to advocate for cuts to public services, health care, and, if the CMA panel report is any indication, user fees and the privatization of health care delivery.

The good news?  Ontario's deficit for the year ended March 31 has come in lower than expected, at $14 billion  -- $5.7 billion less than originally forecast.


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…