Skip to main content

Pension coverage declining in Canada

The percentage of paid workers covered by a registered pension plan (RPP) decreased from 41% to 39% from 1999 to 2009, according to the Office of the Chief Actuary.  

The entire hit was taken by men, whose percentage declined from 42% to 38%.  In contrast, women have achieved a small increase, moving from 39% to 40% (Surpassing the rate achieved by men in 2004.) 

The decline was sharpest in the private sector, with RPP coverage shrinking from 28% to a mere 25%.  But the public sector also saw some decline moving from 88% to 86%.

The type of RPP has also changed.  The superior "defined benefit plans" (where workers are guaranteed a certain pension on retirement) declined from 85% to 75% of all RPPs .  (The other, main, sort of RPP, “defined contribution plans”,  are inferior as they are much more risky for the worker, with pensions depending on investment returns and the going interest rates when you happen to retire.)  

The decline in defined benefit plans was entirely in the private sector with defined benefit coverage shrinking from 75% to 56% of RPPs.  In the public sector, defined benefit coverage was stable at 94% of the RPPs. 

Private sector unionization has declined in recent years, going down with the decline in manufacturing, a cornerstone of the Canadian union movement.  This data suggests that decent working conditions are also declining.   

This is a vital issue for public sector workers as well -- our fortunes are tied to the fortunes of other workers, the private sector included.
  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…