Skip to main content

$50 million superbug law suit claims hospital not properly cleaned

A $50-million class action lawsuit has been certified over a deadly outbreak of C. Difficile at Joseph Brant Memorial Hospital in Burlington, the Hamilton Spectator  reports.

"That's a positive step in the process," said Hamilton lawyer Stanley M. Tick, who represents the claimants with Windsor lawyer Harvey Strosberg.

The lawsuit alleges that Joseph Brant Memorial Hospital was not properly cleaned, maintained and disinfected. None of the allegations have been proved in court. The Spectator notes that "in the years since the outbreak, the hospital has significantly changed procedures and cleaning protocols, invested heavily in infection control, and made other changes recommended by experts."

The superbug overran the hospital from May 2006 to December 2007. But the full extent of the infection was not known, or made public, until the spring of 2008, after a review by expert outsiders.  The hospital announced that 91 infected people had died. About 225 caught C. Difficile. In late 2008, Ontario instituted mandatory public reporting of hospital infections, including C. difficile. 

OCHU/CUPE has for many years campaigned for better superbug public reporting, an end to privatization of hospital housekeeping,  and better resources for hospital housekeeping.  It has also warned that law suiits would result.  Despite this, little was done for years.   

No date has been set for the next stage of the suit.


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…