Skip to main content

American private health care insurance premiums up 113% in ten years

The premiums for the private employer based health care insurance increased 9% in 2011, according to a new study from Kaiser.   In the absence of a public plan, this is the main way non-elderly Americans get insurance, with about 150 million covered.  

While that increase is significantly higher than the last few years, it is in line with the trend over the last ten years, which saw premiums for family plans increase 113%.   The workers' share of the premium has increased by even more: 131%.   That compares with wage increases of 34% on average (and that average includes the wealthy, who have gotten most of the wage increases).  

Family health care premiums hit the (incredible) level of $15,073 (US) annually.   On average, workers pay $4,129 and employers pay $10,944 toward those annual premiums.

There has been a lot criticism about the ten year agreement to increase the Canadian federal government's transfers for health care 6% annually.  But over ten years that would be 34% less than the 113% increase in private US premiums.  Ontario Ministry of Health & LTC spending has increased at a slightly faster rate than the 6% federal escalator (averaging 6.6% over the last ten years), but still far short of US health care premiums.   If the Ministry got the same  percentage increase as US health care premiums over the last ten years, the taxpayers would have to come up with another $11 billion annually.  

Those contemplating more private health care for Canada, should look at the American experience to see what awaits.  

Indeed, the 113% increase in US private insurance premiums has gone hand in hand with decreasing coverage, not just in terms of who gets covered, but also in terms of what gets covered by insurance . More on that tomorrow.  


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…