Skip to main content

Free collective bargaining: Posties win first step

An important victory for workers (like Ontario hospital workers) who are required by law to resolve contract disputes through interest arbitration rather than strikes or lockouts.

Following the lock-out of postal workers by Canada Post earlier this year, the Harper federal government introduced legislation that unilaterally appointed the arbitrator. However, the arbitration process only works if both employer and union agree on the arbitrator. The Harper government appointed a judge without any experience in arbitration.

This is similar to what the Mike Harris government tried to impose on Ontario hospital workers in the 1990s. OCHU/CUPE had to fight this off for four years, before getting an experienced arbitrator acceptable to both parties.

A federal court judge has granted the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) a stay of proceedings. The arbitration will now stop until the union's challenge to the hand-picked arbitrator is heard in January.

CUPW is also challenging another troubling aspect of the legislation, 'final offer selection,' which requires the arbitrator to pick one side or the other, rather than try to find a compromise. This can force the union leadership to take a position in arbitration that is opposed by its own members, effectively separating the union leadership from the union (i.e. the members).  This is not generally a problem for the much less democratic (and much less numerous) management-side of an employment relationship.

Government legislation to prevent or end strikes and lockouts is becoming more and more common. And more and more often, such legislation is biased in favour of the employers (e.g. the Harper government actually imposed a wage settlement on the posties that was less than Canada Post had offered). There is also increasing talk of changing the interest arbitration process for essential workers to favour employers.

So CUPW's victory is an good step forward.

For more on the CUPW ruling see: Straight Goods - Court upholds CUPW challenge


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…