Skip to main content

Get the F out of infrastructure

The 'F' in question is, of course, 'Finance'. As in the Design, Build, and Finance (“DBF”) of public infrastructure projects by the private sector (as is common nowadays for Ontario hospital projects).

Europe is wobbling towards another financial crisis as the banks begin to show signs that they are afraid to lend to each other. Governments are already spending billions to prop up banks in one way or another, but a trillion dollars or more may be needed, some suggest. The Economist has called for "simultaneous injections of capital into the region’s banks" as soon as possible.

As with the last go around (just three years ago) no one knows which businesses will make good on their promises, and which will fail. That drives up the cost to finance infrastructure through private finance relative to public finance. As a result, a financial crisis will drive up the costs of public private partnerships (P3s) -- aka "DBF" projects.

Of all the attempts to escape this problem, the simplest, removing private finance (the F) from the infrastructure deals, is pooh-poohed by the financial industry. Instead, they come up with more and more elaborate schemes to try to save P3s (and keep their profits flowing).

A pity: we cannot afford private finance of public infrastructure at the best of times. And definitely not if we fall back into a financial crisis.


Comments

  1. I was thinking this was a trenchant demand for expanded inrastructure...

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's a different demand Kevin, but trenchant nevertheless!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…