Skip to main content

The good, the bad, and the ugly: three approaches to bargaining

In the past week the leaders of the three largest Ontario parties have all weighed in on collective bargaining in the public sector. Here's the summary (with a little commentary):

  • Liberal leader Dalton McGuinty called for medical doctors to accept a 'pay' freeze for their contract -- although it does not even expire until March . A crafty move, McGunity is simply reiterating his public sector wage policy, but without specifically attacking any of his supporters in the mainstream labour movement. Moreover, there may be a lot more in a deal with the doctors than a simple freeze to their fee schedule, even if that's what gets talked about in the media releases.
  • New Democrat Andrea Horwath defended collective bargaining, responding to McGuinty's comments on the doctors by saying she was surprised the Liberals would begin contract talks in such a way. ``We know that that's a bad way to start negotiations and it's a way that doesn't work.I think we need to have an honest process of negotiations, one that doesn't necessarily say that the front line people -- the nurses, the doctors, the home-care workers -- are the ones that should be taking the financial hit.''
  • Progressive Conservative Tim Hudak also went on the offensive, raising the idea of imposing or legislating a public sector wage freeze as a "last resort". Hudak claimed: "The conventional wisdom holds that every year we must increase the pay of public-sector workers faster than the wages of the private sector workers that pay for them." In fact private sector settlements have been higher than public sector settlement this year and last. Moreover, even a conservative commentator suggests that "Mr. Hudak's talk of negotiating with the unions may be just a smokescreen, so that the government does not fall foul of a 2007 Supreme Court ruling that found British Columbia had violated the Charter by not talking to health unions before it ripped up their collective agreement."

You can decide which is the good, the bad, or the ugly.


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…