Skip to main content

Top 10% take ALL income growth 1971-2008

The Economic Policy Institute has put together an amazing, interactive chart on American incomes, which allows you to see who got what over different time periods from 1917 until 2008.

For the period before the rise of the US industrial labour movement (1917-1936), the top 10% took all of the average income increase.

But during the rise of the U.S. industrial labour movement from 1936 to 1971 the top 10% of income earners got 29% of total income growth, while the bottom 90% got 71% of income growth.  Still far from fair, but better than before -- and after.

From1971 to 2008, a period coinciding with the decline of the US labour movement, the top 10% of income earners got 100% of income growth, while the bottom 90% saw a decline in their income!  


The decline in income wasn't because the economy got worse from 1971 to 2008 -- far from it.  Average income actually went up $9,965 per year.  It was just that the top 10% got ALL of the growth in income.

Even over the period 1998-2008, when average US incomes declined by $458, the top 10% got an increase!

One more thing: average income went up $38,216 in the 91 years between 1917 and 2008.  Most of that ($27,861 or 73% of the total increase) was achieved in the 35 years between 1936 and 1971.

The USA got most of its income growth when income increases were shared more fairly and when unions were more powerful.

Here is the link to the interactive chart -- it is well worth exploring.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staffing.   Less and less of hospital spending is on staff.   Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development.  It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staff per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staffing capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics. The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs).  With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.   But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second...