Drummond: Canada Health Act 'completely irrelevant'

Don Drummond, who is developing a report on public sector reform for the Ontario government, does not want to attack the Canada Health Act (CHA) -- or at least not directly.

The CHA is the federal government legislation which enshrines the five principles of Canadian public health care: Universal, comprehensive, accessible, portable and publicly administered health care for all Canadians.

Drummond made this plain in an interview with CBC television about the Canada Health Act and privatization:

"[P]ut the word privatization, say the word Canada Health Act and you've got a heart attack, you've got an increase in people going to the hospitals just at the mention of those words. You have to be so careful how you approach this thing. So you have to roll some things off the table right at the beginning and then really focus that all this is about is improving the efficiency and that what we're actually trying to drive up the quality of the care, we're not trying to give you a weaker system."

In other words, he realizes that it would be politically bone-headed to directly call for changes to the Canada Health Act. And he is also a little skittish about any frank discussion of privatization.

But, Drummond adds this about the Canada Health Act: "It is bent so severely, if it's not broken it's certainly bent out of shape, who cares? It's completely irrelevant."

It is true that Stephen Harper is not doing much of a job enforcing the five principles. But the Canada Health Act makes it much more difficult for pro-privatization politicians (and their advisors) to move away from universal, comprehensive, portable, accessible, and publicly administered health care services for all Canadians.

Unfortunately, Drummond's positioning on the Canada Health Act (and privatization more generally) is helping him advance his line of attack on those very items.

Many columnists have applauded his 'I'm not attacking the Canada Health Act or privatizing health care' line. They seem to view him as a moderate from Bay Street -- even while he has called for the privatization of health care delivery (a gem from the Harris era). Or how about this comment from Drummond to the CBC?

"I'm thinking let's go through the five or six years and redesign the system, make it more efficient and make it serve the client better."

Former Progressive Conservative premier Mike Harris himself might have said that very thing -- before his disastrous experiments with health care restructuring.

Comments

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data. This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization. Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion. That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year. The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million. In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2.

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding: There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities). For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year. But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staﬃng. Less and less of hospital spending is on staff. Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development. It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staﬀ per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staﬃng capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another 33,778 full t

Defend Public Healthcare

Search This Blog