Skip to main content

Drummond: Canada Health Act 'completely irrelevant'

Don Drummond, who is developing a report on public sector reform for the Ontario government, does not want to attack the Canada Health Act (CHA) -- or at least not directly.

The CHA is the federal government legislation which enshrines the five principles of Canadian public health care:  Universal, comprehensive, accessible, portable and publicly administered health care for all Canadians.

Drummond made this plain in an interview with CBC television about the Canada Health Act and privatization:
"[P]ut the word privatization, say the word Canada Health Act and you've got a heart attack, you've got an increase in people going to the hospitals just at the mention of those words. You have to be so careful how you approach this thing. So you have to roll some things off the table right at the beginning and then really focus that all this is about is improving the efficiency and that what we're actually trying to drive up the quality of the care, we're not trying to give you a weaker system."
In other words, he realizes that it would be politically bone-headed to directly call for changes to the Canada Health Act. And he is also a little skittish about any frank discussion of privatization.

But, Drummond adds this about the Canada Health Act: "It is bent so severely, if it's not broken it's certainly bent out of shape, who cares? It's completely irrelevant."

It is true that Stephen Harper is not doing much of a job enforcing the five principles. But the Canada Health Act makes it much more difficult for pro-privatization politicians (and their advisors) to move away from universal, comprehensive, portable, accessible, and publicly administered health care services for all Canadians.


Unfortunately, Drummond's positioning on the Canada Health Act (and privatization more generally) is helping him advance his line of attack on those very items.  


Many columnists have applauded his 'I'm not attacking the Canada Health Act or privatizing health care' line.  They seem to view him as a moderate from Bay Street -- even while he has called for the privatization of health care delivery (a gem from the Harris era).  Or how about this comment from Drummond to the CBC?


"I'm thinking let's go through the five or six years and redesign the system, make it more efficient and make it serve the client better."


Former Progressive Conservative premier Mike Harris himself might have said that very thing -- before his disastrous experiments with health care restructuring.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…