Hospitals propose labour relations changes

The Ontario Hospital Association has released a report entitled, OHA Position Statement on Funding and Capacity Planning for Ontario’s Health System and Hospitals. After discussing various reforms in health care delivery, the seventh and final point deals with "options for addressing labour costs".

The OHA argues that there "are limited options available for meeting very ambitious expenditure reduction targets in a compressed period of time". To maintain service levels "consideration will have to be given to finding ways to restrain the growth in the prices paid for labour".

The OHA argues that this area "will need to be explored particularly if there is little choice in making rapid and substantial funding cuts". To their credit, the OHA recognizes that such changes "may not create long term or lasting savings" but states that other changes may not solve immediate funding pressures. "Given the very high level of efficiency at which hospitals are currently performing, labour cost restraints will be necessary throughout all health care sectors".

So what do they want? They remain vague but do call for three items.

The OHA calls for "changes to the Hospital Labour Disputes Arbitration Act to further guide arbitrators’ decisions." What exactly they mean, they don't say, but presumably they want changes that will bias interest arbitrator decisions in favour of the health car employers, so that collective agreements are more to their liking (and less to the employees'). Mike Harris tried a similar trick in the 1990s when he was premier, but came to his senses a few years later.

As in the past, the OHA recommends the creation of "a designated Employer Bargaining Agency for health
services employers to strengthen the bargaining process." This is an old recommendation from the OHA, but one which could see far reaching changes in bargaining, and possibly, bargaining unit structure in Ontario health care.

Finally, they recommend an amendment "to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act to permit hospitals to elect coverage under Schedule II of the Act (i.e. self insurance) to reduce costs and provide an incentive for workplace safety.

Comments

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding: There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities). For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year. But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data. This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization. Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion. That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year. The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million. In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2.

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding : While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments. In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS. But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery : Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada. But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily Medavie, a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit. Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance. It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees. It now a

Defend Public Healthcare

Search This Blog