Skip to main content

Hospitals propose labour relations changes


The Ontario Hospital Association has released  a report entitled, OHA Position Statement on Funding and Capacity Planning for Ontario’s Health System and Hospitals.  After discussing various reforms in health care delivery, the seventh and final point deals with "options for addressing labour costs".

The OHA argues that there "are limited options available for meeting very ambitious expenditure reduction targets in a compressed period of time".  To maintain service levels "consideration will have to be given to finding ways to restrain the growth in the prices paid for labour".

The OHA argues that this area "will need to be explored particularly if there is little choice in making rapid and substantial funding cuts".  To their credit, the OHA recognizes that such changes "may not create long term or lasting savings" but states that other changes may not solve immediate funding pressures.  "Given the very high level of efficiency at which hospitals are currently performing, labour cost restraints will be necessary throughout all health care sectors".

So what do they want?   They remain vague but do call for three items.

The OHA calls for "changes to the Hospital Labour Disputes Arbitration Act to further guide arbitrators’ decisions."  What exactly they mean, they don't say, but presumably they want changes that will bias interest arbitrator decisions in favour of the health car employers, so that collective agreements are more to their liking (and less to the employees').  Mike Harris tried a similar trick in the 1990s when he was premier, but came to his senses a few years later.

As in the past, the OHA recommends the creation of "a designated Employer Bargaining Agency for health
services employers to strengthen the bargaining process."    This is an old recommendation from the OHA, but one which could see far reaching changes in bargaining, and possibly, bargaining unit structure in Ontario health care.

Finally, they recommend an amendment "to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act to permit hospitals to elect coverage under Schedule II of the Act (i.e. self insurance) to reduce costs and provide an incentive for workplace safety.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …