Hospitals propose labour relations changes

The Ontario Hospital Association has released a report entitled, OHA Position Statement on Funding and Capacity Planning for Ontario’s Health System and Hospitals. After discussing various reforms in health care delivery, the seventh and final point deals with "options for addressing labour costs".

The OHA argues that there "are limited options available for meeting very ambitious expenditure reduction targets in a compressed period of time". To maintain service levels "consideration will have to be given to finding ways to restrain the growth in the prices paid for labour".

The OHA argues that this area "will need to be explored particularly if there is little choice in making rapid and substantial funding cuts". To their credit, the OHA recognizes that such changes "may not create long term or lasting savings" but states that other changes may not solve immediate funding pressures. "Given the very high level of efficiency at which hospitals are currently performing, labour cost restraints will be necessary throughout all health care sectors".

So what do they want? They remain vague but do call for three items.

The OHA calls for "changes to the Hospital Labour Disputes Arbitration Act to further guide arbitrators’ decisions." What exactly they mean, they don't say, but presumably they want changes that will bias interest arbitrator decisions in favour of the health car employers, so that collective agreements are more to their liking (and less to the employees'). Mike Harris tried a similar trick in the 1990s when he was premier, but came to his senses a few years later.

As in the past, the OHA recommends the creation of "a designated Employer Bargaining Agency for health
services employers to strengthen the bargaining process." This is an old recommendation from the OHA, but one which could see far reaching changes in bargaining, and possibly, bargaining unit structure in Ontario health care.

Finally, they recommend an amendment "to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act to permit hospitals to elect coverage under Schedule II of the Act (i.e. self insurance) to reduce costs and provide an incentive for workplace safety.

Comments

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data. This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization. Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion. That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year. The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million. In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staﬃng. Less and less of hospital spending is on staff. Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development. It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staﬀ per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staﬃng capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics. The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs). With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed. But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea. Following a recent second...

Defend Public Healthcare

Search This Blog