Skip to main content

OECD data reveals shortcomings of privatized US health care

Here's the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's (OECD's) latest report on U.S. health care funding.
The United States spent 17.4% of GDP on health in 2009, much more than the OECD average of 9.6%.
Details: Spending per person is two-and-a-half times higher than the OECD average. Total health spending accounted for 17.4% of GDP in the United States in 2009, by far the highest share in the OECD. Following the United States were the Netherlands, France and Germany, which allocated respectively 12.0%, 11.8% and 11.6% of their GDP to health. The OECD average was 9.6%.  
The United States also ranks far ahead of other OECD countries in health spending per capita, with spending of 7,960 USD in 2009, two-and-a-half times greater than the OECD average of 3,233 USD (adjusted for purchasing power parity).
With less than half of health care funded by the public sector in the USA (compared to 72% for the 34 developed countries in the OECD) and with for-profit corporations playing a large role in U.S. health care, the US is the leading model of  privatization.  If 'leading' is the right word.

The OECD has a special report on high US health care spending.  It notes:
  • Hospital spending is higher than in five other OECD countries which spend a lot on health care (Germany, Switzerland, France, Japan, and Canada).
  • Spending on Ambulatory care providers – that is, physicians and specialists as well as dentists -- is much higher than in the other high spending OECD countries
  •  Spending on Pharmaceuticals and medical goods is higher in the US than in any other country.
  •  Spending on Public Health and Administration is particularly high – more than two-and-a-half times the average. Administration of the US health system alone accounts for about 7% share of total spending. In comparison, Canada and Japan devote around 4% of health spending on administration. (The high US administrative costs are driven, no doubt, by its inefficient, multi-payer, privatized insurance system.)
Prices in the privatized US system are high:  "the evidence suggests that prices for health services and goods are substantially higher in the United States than elsewhere."

Mark Pearson, the head of the OECD Health Division told Reuters that one reason prices are higher in the United States is that the healthcare system lacks what other countries have: an effective government mechanism that acts to keep prices down. "That's simply not there in the U.S. system. So it's a structural defect," he said.

Kaiser asks: "So what are Americans getting for their money? The U.S. has the best five-year survival rate for breast cancer and comes in second, behind Japan, in terms of colorectal cancer survival.  But the U.S. ranks 27th in life expectancy at birth, 31st in premature mortality, and 25th in the rate of cardiovascular mortality. The U.S. has the second worst rate of adult diabetes, behind Mexico, and has the highest rate of adult obesity, at 34 percent."



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th
Post a Comment
Read more

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 
Post a Comment
Read more

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding :  While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments.  In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS.  But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery :  Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada.   But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily  Medavie,  a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit.  Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance.  It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees.  It now a
Post a Comment
Read more