Skip to main content

Union density cracks 30% again. That's the good news.

A report from the Canadian government suggests that union density (of non-agricultural, paid workers) went up over 30% again, hitting 30.8% in 2010, up from 29.9% in 2009.  As well, union membership hit a new high of 4.645 million, almost 600,000 more than in 2000. 

That's the good news.  

The bad news is that the increase in union density is a one year break in a long decline from 32.2% density in 2000.  Moreover, the increased density in 2010 mostly reflects a shrinking workforce, occasioned by the poor economy.  If the workforce had even stayed the same in 2010 as in 2009, the density would be only 30.2%.   

Union Membership in Canada, 2000–2010

YearUnion Membership
Labour Force*
Paid Workers*
Union Membership
as a Percentage of Civilian
Labour Force
Union Membership as a Percentage of Non-Agricultural Paid Worker
* Statistics Canada, The Labour Force Survey, Labour Statistics Division
Note: Civilian labour force and non-agricultural paid employment data shown for each year are annual averages of the preceding year; data shown for union membership are as of January of the years shown and as reported by labour organizations.
Source: Strategic Policy, Analysis, and Workplace Information Directorate. Labour Program, Human Resources and Skills Development Canada.

CUPE remains the largest union by a considerable margin.  Some of the (primarily) private sector unions report they have not been as hard hit as one might have thought. The Steelworkers report an impressive sounding 280,000 members and the Food and Commercial Workers report 245,327. 

Labour Organizations with Largest Membership—2010

Name of AffiliationMembership
Canadian Union of Public Employees - CLC601,976
National Union of Public and General Employees - CLC340,000
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union - AFL-CIO/CLC280,000
United Food and Commercial Workers Canada - CtW/CLC245,327
National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW Canada) - CLC195,000
Public Service Alliance of Canada - CLC188,462
Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada - CLC128,564
Fédération de la santé et des services sociaux - CSN122,193
Teamsters Canada - CtW/CLC113,851
Service Employees International Union - CtW/CLC92,781
Alberta Union of Provincial Employees - Ind.79,004
Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario - CLC73,325

National unions based in Canada now account for 67.3% of union membership (68.8% including directly chartered Canadian locals).

Composition of Unions—2010

Type of UnionUnionsMembership
Independent Local Organizations26334.1178,6253.8
Directly Chartered Unions29037.667,7301.5

Just under half of the total union membership are in the 9 unions with over 100,000 members.  Another 209 unions account for the other 50%. 

Table 5: National and International Unions by Size—2010

under 9996724,21673,1897427,405
100,000 and over*61,576,1953639,17892,215,373
Note: Directly chartered and independent local unions are not included.


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…