Skip to main content

P3 hospitals forced to spend "EXTORTIONATE SUMS" on contractors -- Health Minister

Last night Andrew Lansley, the British health minister, condemned the high fees charged by private corporations to do basic repair work in public private partnership (P3) hospitals.   P3s allow private corporations to become involved in the financing and maintenance of hospitals.   Ontario has followed Britain into using P3s for hospital projects.

Lansley told the Telegraph: "[Hospitals are] being forced to spend extortionate sums on private contractors rather than spending that money on helping sick patients get better."

The Telegraph (a conservative newspaper) reports that a series of Freedom of Information requests has disclosed how hospitals that are locked into long term P3 deals are forced to pay “hyper-inflated” charges for basic services.  Figures uncovered by the Telegraph show the following examples of charges from private corporations that won P3 hospital contracts:

  • North Staffordshire hospital paid £242 to put on  a padlock
  • North Cumbria University Hospital paid £466 to replace a light fitting and £75 for an air freshener.
  • A hospital in Salisbury paid £15,000 to “install a laundry door following feasibility study”. 
  • £8,450 to install an “additional dishwasher” for a hospital in Hull, 
  • £962 to “supply and fix notice-board” at a hospital in Leeds, 
  • £26,614 for the “replacement of shower room doors” at the Sussex hospital,
  • The Coventry and Warwickshire University Hospital was charged £4,459 to “supply and install a new CCTV camera”, 
  • Ipswich Hospital was billed £120 to call out an engineer to reset an alarm.  The same trust in Ipswich also was charged four separate payments of £120 on false call-outs.

These costly P3 deals are causing significant problems for British public healthcare – 22 hospitals appealed to the Department of Health earlier this year for financial support because high P3 bills threatened their clinical and financial health.
No one from the PPP Forum, which represents construction companies, financial businesses and law firms that make money from 'PFI' (the British name for P3s), was available for comment to the Telegraph.
The Conservative Health minister Lansley blames the previous government for the mess: “Unless we take action, these post-dated cheques left to us by Labour could seriously impact on patients.  That is why this Government is working with trusts with PFI related financial problems. We will not make the sick pay for Labour's debt crisis.”
Last month, George Osborne, the Chancellor, published plans to overhaul PFI. But, despite all the complaints from the government about PFI, it is unlikely the Conservatives will make any fundamental changes. 


  1. While the fees are in & of themselves offensive, I'll bet my figgy pudding that the workers aren't being paid above the bare minimum (w/ no benefits, of course).

  2. I think you are up one figgy pudding...


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…