Skip to main content

P3s? Construction Association concerned about impact on Canadian firms

The Canadian Construction Association is lobbying the federal government to consider other methods of infrastructure development than the current public private partnership (P3) model.


A Vancouver construction industry report indicates that P3s "have worked only for a handful of very large Canadian construction firms. Ninety per cent of the Canadian construction industry, however, is made up of small and medium-sized firms."


"The problem is in the financing component of the P3s. Traditionally, Canadian general contractors have depended on bonds purchased from the bonding industy for financial backing for projects. P3s don’t use bonds in the same way. They require letters of credit – cash from recognized financial institutions.  Often P3s require 10% of the cost of a project covered by money in the bank. On a very large project, that can amount to hundreds of millions of dollars.  Most construction companies in Canada are not financially large enough to play in that arena.  The result is smaller Canadian construction companies are either shut out of P3 projects in favour of very large, often offshore, consortiums or, at best, they are reduced to being subcontractors working for those consortiums."


“As an industry we are lobbying for the government to consider other methods so Canadians aren’t left out of the P3 game,” says Dee Miller, the Chair of the Canadian Construction Association.
The Canadian Construction Association is reportedly asking government to look at performance and material bonds to back P3 projects just as they have always underpinned other construction projects, or that Ottawa launch a Canadian infrastructure government savings bond program that ordinary citizens could buy into.
“If governments plan to solve our infrastructure deficit by predominantly using the public-private partnership process as it is currently structured, they will literally hollow out the Canadian construction industry,” Miller warned.
The Canadian Construction Association has more than 17,000 member firms across Canada.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …