Skip to main content

Lowest rated P3 ever goes to market (& costs rise)

The largest public private partnership (P3) bond financing in Canada has raised $1.37 billion for a new Montreal hospital. It is for what must be one of the longest P3 deals as well -- a 38.8 year deal to build, finance, and maintain the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM).

The National Post reports that the four equity partners in the P3 deal are all European corporations. Canadian and Quebec partners were squeezed out once again, it seems.

The P3 financing deal is also the lowest-rated one ever to come to market. The Post reports that the bonds came with a 6.721% coupon.
"Part of the difficulty attracting buyers was the credit profile of the investment. The issue was rated BBB (high) by DBRS, one notch higher than the Baa2 assigned by Moody's Investors Service Inc. Every single P3 that has been broadly marketed so far in Canada has enjoyed an A-level rating."
The Post goes on to note:

"If the CHUM deal proved one thing, it's that issuers don't need A-category credit ratings to do bond transactions in the P3 world. It also showed that there's no natural limit on the size of such transactions. ... 'It's really just one more deal,' Mr. McCallum (of RBC Capital Markets, which underwrote the deal) said, modestly. 'There's a maturing of the sector. And this deal is another marker in the maturing of the sector.' "
Critics argue that the cost of financing P3s is too high, and that government financing is more affordable than private financing.

This deal raises the cost of P3s to even higher levels.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…