Skip to main content

LHINs to decide which surgeries should be moved from hospitals

Health Minister Deb Matthews signalled that the LHINs would decide which surgeries and tests should be shifted from hospitals to clinics, the Ottawa Citizen reports.  "We will expect the LHINs to do the work to determine what, if any, procedures there are that could be better delivered in the community," Matthews said.


Moving work out of hospitals is a major policy direction for the Ontario Liberal government.


LHINs are, of course, supposed to integrate health care (their full name is Local Health Integration Network) so it is amusing that they are now supposed to fragment health care by moving work to new providers.  (Oh what a tangled web we weave...)


The Citizen also reports Matthews hinted that she would be open to having the Ottawa Hospital's cataract clinic spun off as a stand-alone corporation, if health officials can demonstrate that such a move "would provide high-quality care at a lower price."  Currently, the Ottawa Hospital clinic provides all cataract surgeries in the area. 




Comments

  1. This makes sense, hospitals should be used for things that you require the conditions only available in a hospital. If something can be done outside of that setting, it makes sense to do so given the costs to run a facility as complex as a hospital. We no longer need surgery to cure ulcers, or days of recovery after most surgeries. Centralize some services so that the primary services of a hospital are better utilized, while putting services that can be completed in the community in environments lest costly to run and maintain. The liberals do need to stop using the LHINs as a PR tool and let them function as a crown corporation independent of political manipulation (or at least as much as one can expect)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…