Skip to main content

84 patients with C. difficile die -- but no lawsuits (yet)

Eight senior doctors at Burnaby General Hospital have raised concerns about infection control at the hospital, after 473 patients were seriously infected with C. difficile.

Eighty-four of those patients died.

The eight doctors (including 6 department heads) wrote that "current CDAD [C. difficile] infection control management at Burnaby a serious hazard to the patient population. ...Such is the degree of the CDAD problem and the ineffectual response to it, that we believe it could objectively be considered medical negligence."

The doctors made 16 recommendations to resolve the problem, including the immediate institution of enhanced cleaning within hospital units.  The doctors point to a lack of enhanced cleaning of high C.difficile medical units despite a recommendation from the infection control committee following the late-2011 outbreaks.

Hospital Employees Union spokesperson Margi Blamey said a focus needs to be put on resources for cleaning. "Cleaning is integral to infection control. That is about people. You need to staff it adequately."

 NDP Leader Adrian Dix called on the government to order a review of the hospital’s infection control procedures.  “The physicians in this case want a review of the facility housekeeping contract to break the chain of infection and to protect patients.” Mr. Dix told the legislature.

As in Ontario, government officials say not every death was caused by the superbug.  The letter however reportedly cites a recent medical review that found in Ontario hospital outbreaks of C. difficile, 80 per cent of the deaths were directly attributed to the complications of the bug.

The letter suggests the heath authority has not yet faced malpractice suits because the outbreaks were not publicly reported.  "We believe the only reason that such action has not already taken place is the lack of public transparency as to the extent of the problem," they wrote.

Ontario introduced public reports of superbug levels after years of campaigning by OCHU.  OCHU is still fighting to get reports of deaths associated with superbugs.  


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…