Skip to main content

LHINs get stuck with even less funding


The Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) are getting stuck again.  

According to the newly released Budget Estimates, the government is cutting their funding.  The cut is, at least, small ($3.25 million out of a total LHIN funding of $23 billion). LHINs are the primary funders of hospitals, long term care homes, and home care. 


Last year, at least they got a little bit of an increase -- 0.9% (based on the scope of services the LHINs are currently supposed to cover).  That gives the LHINs a whopping $64 million extra to play with compared with two years ago.  That might sound like something until you consider they provide $23 billion in services.  

In effect, the government is making the LHINs the bad news bearers.  With no new money, they are going to have to squeeze the providers.  Health care consultants who dreamed that LHINs would become powerful agents for change will be disappointed.  At most, the LHINs will have to suffice with encouraging change through a lack of money. 

The government, in contrast, is allowing itself the right to make new funding announcements via new Provincial Program  funding. 

As in recent years, almost all the new health care funding is going not to the LHINs but to the line item described as  “Provincial Programs and Stewardship”.   The Provincial Programs and Stewardship  line will get $0.932 billion in new funding (out of a total of $1.012 billion new health care funding).  That’s 92% of the new health care operating funding.  

This isn't new -- the government has been starving the LHINs for years while increasing their own "Provincial Program" funding, especially the vaguely named "Community and Priority Program" sub-line item.  (Although there is at least one part of the new Provincial Programs funding that is fairly specific – the promised $125 million for home renovation tax credits.)   

The total health care operating expense increase for 2012-13 is 2.17%.  The total capital and operating expense increase is 1.9% (notably less than the 2.3% suggested in the Budget at table 2.29) .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …