Skip to main content

60% of hospitals forced to cut costs

Hamilton hospital managers are raising concerns about the new fee-for-service funding system for hospitals. The Hamilton Spectator reports that the new funding model will force 60 per cent of hospitals to lower their costs because the fees paid will be based on the cost per case of hospital's at the 40 percentile.

Every hospital in Hamilton has costs higher than the 40th percentile.  The Spectator adds that Hamilton hospitals say there is no way they can match the costs of community hospitals that send their toughest cases to them. They want to be compared against other hospitals that care for the sickest and most complex patients. 

"It's going to be fairly daunting," Dr. Bill Evans, president of Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, told the Spec. "Whether it's truly possible to deliver the volume of care at that level of funding remains to be seen.... Fortieth percentile seems terribly low to me. But it is what it is and we'll just have to work with it."

Kevin Smith, the Hamilton Hospital CEO with close ties to the provincial government states, "There are issues, particularly in teaching and research, that we really need to better understand and those won't dovetail always with the lowest cost. I've heard lots of concerns, but I think there has been recognition that we will break some eggs along the way and we'll come back and look at it."

Smith suggests there may be some wiggle room: "It's saying if someone can do it at that rate, that's the rate we're willing to fund it at. If it's apples to apples, I think that is fair. If it's not apples to apples, that's the more difficult part. We're going to have a policy discussion about how we're going to handle it."

"We are concerned about it," said Dr. Wes Stephen, chief of surgery at Hamilton Health Sciences. Dr. Anthony Adili, chief of surgery at St. Joseph's Healthcare adds, "What the hospital is trying to grapple with right now is what impact will this new funding have."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…