Skip to main content

Hospital funding agreements delayed - but target June 30

Ontario hospitals are funded by the Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) through "accountability agreements".

Last December 16, a joint steering committee of the LHINs and the Ontario Hospital Association met to discuss the process for 2012 and agreed "that the economic environment continues to remain challenging and that multi-year funding targets will likely not be provided." Accordingly, they aimed for a one year extension of the existing agreements (which started way back in 2008). Hospital Annual Planning Submissions  ("HAPS" -- the secretive documents that hospitals submit to the LHINs before the accountability agreements are finalized) were to be distributed to the hospitals in January, as were hospital funding  targets.  The plan was to have the accountability agreements in place when the existing agreements expired on March 31, 2012.

This was not to be.

Since then, the government announced new funding models for the hospitals.  This will alter the base budget for many hospitals and likely created some delay.

The forms for the HAPS only went out in April and the hospitals have received a preliminary estimate of their individual funding levels for the coming year. With the delay, hospitals have signed simple three month extensions of the existing accountability agreements, taking those hospitals through to June 30, 2012.

The goal, as of  April 17, was to sign-off the full 2012-13 accountability agreements "by June 30th in most cases" (although "agreement to negotiate extensions for a couple of weeks will not be unreasonably withheld"). They are giving some leeway to hospitals that find out their actual funding for this year is off by more than half a percent from their preliminary estimated funding. (It is not clear to me how reliable the preliminary funding estimates received by the hospitals are.)

The target date for the Hospital Annual Planning Submission to go to the LHIN is today -- May 29. Has this happened? That too is not clear to me. After the HAPS are submitted, the LHINs are supposed to review them and negotiate accountability agreements with the hospitals in their area.

As with the hospital Quality Improvement Plans discussed in the last post, your hospital accountability agreement is worth reviewing.  The agreements set out key government-set priorities for your hospital and conditions that your hospital must meet. As the government is the main funder of the hospital, those priorities are worth knowing: a hospital has to meet the terms of its agreement to get the funding.

As the new funding systems will change the base funding for many hospitals, the accountability agreements may be especially interesting this year. Compare it with last year's -- there may be some significant differences, as some hospitals get more (or less) than others.

Hospital accountability agreements should be posted on the web site of your LHIN and your hospital, when finalized.


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…