If contracting out works, why do they keep suspending it?

The Ontario government's system of contracting out for home care services (the so-called "competitive bidding" system) has been put on hold for another two years, it seems.

Following a meeting with government officials, various bosses and mucky-mucks in the Ontario home care industry have come out and declared the following:

As proposed in a first step in a phased transition, new contracts would be developed and then negotiated with existing service providers outside of a competitive bidding process, effective October 1st, 2012 for the subsequent two year period (2014). These new contracts would reflect the realities of our environment; quality imperatives, fiscal restraint, greater focus on client-centred care and defined client populations, and the requirement to collaborate and implement change over a short period of time. In subsequent phases it is proposed that all home care contracts will be renewed based on clear performance metrics related to transition, quality improvement, client satisfaction, innovation and value for money. Opportunities for new entrants to obtain contracts would be provided through joint ventures, subcontracts or other arrangements.

They claim “the Ministry looks forward to receiving a proposed plan from the sector for moving forward in order to establish new service contracts by October 2012.”

This is just the latest suspension of compulsory contracting. In the face of community opposition, the government has been forced to suspend the process for years. Most recently, Health Minister George Smitherman tried to bring it back in 2007, but that quickly blew up in his face.

If you can believe the home care bosses, this time around they are trying to stop providers losing contracts and limit new entrants to the industry even after October 2014.

The good news is that this may provide a bit more stability to an industry that, for decades, was supposed to be the cornerstone of government reform, but was actually being restructured back to the stone age.

The bad news is that this will cement the role of for-profit providers -- who took most of the work away from not-for-profit community providers after compulsory contracting was introduced by the Mike Harris government.

The government plans to introduce a similar contracting system for surgeries and other health care services. Health care privatization really is like the zombies: they may take a blast to the head but they still keep getting up.

Comments

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding: There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities). For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year. But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data. This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization. Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion. That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year. The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million. In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2.

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding : While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments. In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS. But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery : Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada. But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily Medavie, a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit. Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance. It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees. It now a

Defend Public Healthcare

Search This Blog