Skip to main content

If contracting out works, why do they keep suspending it?

The Ontario government's system of contracting out for home care services (the so-called "competitive bidding" system) has been put on hold for another two years, it seems. 

Following a meeting with government officials, various bosses and mucky-mucks in the Ontario home care industry have come out and  declared the following:  

As proposed in a first step in a phased transition, new contracts would be developed and then negotiated with existing service providers outside of a competitive bidding process, effective October 1st, 2012 for the subsequent two year period (2014). These new contracts would reflect the realities of our environment; quality imperatives, fiscal restraint, greater focus on client-centred care and defined client populations, and the requirement to collaborate and implement change over a short period of time.   In subsequent phases it is proposed that all home care contracts will be renewed based on clear performance metrics related to transition, quality improvement, client satisfaction, innovation and value for money. Opportunities for new entrants to obtain contracts would be provided through joint ventures, subcontracts or other arrangements.

They claim “the Ministry looks forward to receiving a proposed plan from the sector for moving forward in order to establish new service contracts by October 2012.”   

This is just the latest suspension of compulsory contracting.  In the face of community opposition, the government has been forced to suspend the process for years.  Most recently, Health Minister George Smitherman tried to bring it back in 2007, but that quickly blew up in his face.  

If you can believe the home care bosses, this time around they are trying to stop providers losing contracts and limit new entrants to the industry even after October 2014.  

The good news is that this may provide a bit more stability to an industry that, for decades, was supposed to be the cornerstone of government reform, but was actually being restructured back to the stone age.   

The bad news is that this will cement the role of for-profit providers  -- who took most of the work away from not-for-profit community providers after compulsory contracting was introduced by the Mike Harris government.  

The government plans to introduce a similar contracting system for surgeries and other health care services.  Health care privatization really is like the zombies:  they may take a blast to the head but they still keep getting up. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…