Skip to main content

Is a Liberal-PC gang-up on collective bargaining coming?

In the Ontario Budget Bill, the Liberals tried to make some changes to interest arbitration for essential service workers like police officers, firefighters, and hospital workers who are not allowed, by law, to strike so must use interest arbitration to settle collective bargaining disputes.  The amendments would have made it hard if not impossible for respected arbitrators to work on interest arbitrations.

The NDP opposed the proposals. So did the Progressive Conservatives (PCs) -- but for different reasons.  They wanted the process turned even more in favour of employers, at the expense of essential employees.

As a result, the proposals were defeated and the Budget bill was passed without them.  The governing Liberals said, however, that they would bring changes to interest arbitration back to the legislature in the fall, with Dalton McGuinty saying he wanted to work with the PCs (so he could tack right).

That could be a tall order.  So far,only the NDP has been willing to work with the government.  Moreover, PC leader Tim Hudak said he would bargain hard over any amendments.

The PCs Labour critic Randy Hillier introduced a Bill in the most recent session of the legislature affecting interest arbitration. The Bill did not get anywhere, but Hudak has suggested that the Liberals should look to that Bill, if they want PC support.    

The Bill  (#70) was called the Trust in Arbitration Act 2012.  And indeed the Act would create great trust in arbitration -- for short-sighted governments.  

Rather than arbitrators agreed to by the parties, the Act would have created an "Independent Arbitrators Commission".  The (so-called)  "Independent Arbitrators" would be appointed by cabinet.  

The cabinet would determine the wages of the Commissioners (and require parties involved in disputes to pay fees for the use of the Commission).

The "chief commissioner" (also chosen by cabinet) would  choose the commissioner or panel (and the type of panel) to resolve the collective agreement dispute in question.  He or she would  also choose the method of dispute resolution to be used.  

While the Bill would initially cover firefighters, police and hospital workers, cabinet would be given the power to expand the Bill's coverage to other workers in the broader public sector.  

Hillier suggests  that he is enacting Don Drummond’s recommendation on arbitration.  “The commission will be mandated by this legislation to resolve disputes in light of the fiscal environment of the province and/or the employer; it specifies that tax increases are not a justifiable means to increase arbitration settlement awards.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Huge cuts in public sector wages predicted

The Ontario Financial Accountability Office (FAO)   says  that, with inflation, real wages in the public sector will decline 11.3% over the three year period  2021/2 - 2023/4 .  This would radically deepen the trend towards lower wages during the last ten years.   The FAO reports that since 2011, the average annual salary for the Ontario public sector employees (defined here as employees of schools, colleges, provincial government, provincial agencies, and hospitals) has increased by $10,385   -- or 1.6 per cent on average annually.  This is the lowest increase of all the sectors and lower than inflation, which averaged 1.8 per cent per year. Over the ten years that would be about a 2% pay cut.   The FAO reports that wage settlements were the lowest in the provincial public sector over the last decade:   Hospital Wages Especially Challenged: The FAO predicts hospital wages will increase even less than in the public sector  -- just ...

Are health care administrative expenses out of control in Ontario?

The Progressive Conservative government has justified its health restructuring plans with the claim that administrative expenses are much higher in Ontario than in Canada.  When introducing the reforms, health minister Christine Elliott  claimed , “Over the last five years, Ontario has spent 30% more than the Canadian average in administrative expenses on its health care system.”   Elliott did not indicate her source of information. Presumably, however, the Progressive Conservatives are referring to the CIHI simplified and user friendly “ Your Health System ” graphs. Those graphs show “administrative expenses” in Ontario at 5.8% in Ontario while it is 4.5% in Canada.   This CIHI measure is actually fairly narrowly defined. It is the percentage of “the legal entity’s” total expenses associated with the administrative, finance, human resources and communications functional centres. However “the legal entity” used for this estimate is [1] only...

Too many public sector workers in Ontario?

Opponents of public services often try to portray the public sector as having grown disproportionately.  In fact, since 1976, the number of public sector employees has not quite kept pace with the population. In 1976, the number of public sector employees in Ontario  as reported by Statistics Canada averaged 830,800.  By 2012, the number had increased to 1,330,700 -- a 60.2% increase.  That sounds like significant growth -- true. But the population has increased  from 8,413,779 in 1976 to 13,505,900 in 2012, a 60.5% increase.   In other words, population growth has run slightly ahead of the growth in public sector employment.     In 1976, close to 10% of the population worked in the public sector.  It stayed pretty much this way until the Mike Harris government came to power when it dipped below 9%.  It returned close to the historical range in the last six years or so, declining in 2012 to below the 1976 averag...