Skip to main content

P3 hospitals go poof -- Should P3 lenders take a haircut too?

The mother country of public private partnerships (P3s) is now preparing to take over a nearly bankrupt health care trust that runs three hospitals.  Like other British hospitals, the South London hospital trust was devastated by its P3 deals.

The mother country in question -- Britain --  will take over the hospitals and run them under a trusteeship, probably within weeks.

A Department of Health official reports the hospital trust is spending £61 million per year on two P3 deals, forking over 14% of its income.  The hospital trust is losing £1 million a week.   The trust has accumulated a deficit of £150m (about $240 million). 


The P3 fiasco has led some Conservatives to question whether the P3 deals transfer risk to the private sector.


With the announcement, a senior Conservative British MP, Stephen Dorrell (the former health secretary who now chairs the Commons health select committee), suggests that P3 lenders should, like lenders to Greece, bear their share of risk and take "a haircut" when things go wrong. 

The Conservative MP adds that private finance initiative "as originally conceived 20 years ago was to achieve some risk transfer, to engage the private sector in making this kind of judgment and to carry some of the risk."  


Dorrell  regrets that "agreements were signed which effectively paid private sector cost when the public sector took the risk. That is indefensible." 


The alleged risk transfer to the private sector is the main way the P3 industry justifies the extra costs associated with P3s.

Mike Farrar, the chief executive of the NHS Confederation noted  "To recover the kind of sums you are facing in south London you really do need wholesale redesign of services in order to get something sustainable for the future".

Earlier this year the government announced that 22 trusts were suffering financial problems due to their P3 deals, providing some with extra funding to prevent disaster.  

The Department of Health has set goals for twenty trusts overseeing 60 hospitals  -- but they may ultimately face special measures similar to the South London hospital trust.

The Telegraph reports there are fears that services such as accident and emergency departments will be cut or downgraded to save money, or that some hospitals could close.  Sources close to the health secretary report that the South London's hospital trust’s deficit last year was equal to the salaries of 1,200 nurses or 200 hip replacements a week.

The British P3 model has been exported to other countries, including Canada and Ontario.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…