P3 hospitals go poof -- Should P3 lenders take a haircut too?

The mother country of public private partnerships (P3s) is now preparing to take over a nearly bankrupt health care trust that runs three hospitals. Like other British hospitals, the South London hospital trust was devastated by its P3 deals.

The mother country in question -- Britain -- will take over the hospitals and run them under a trusteeship, probably within weeks.

A Department of Health official reports the hospital trust is spending £61 million per year on two P3 deals, forking over 14% of its income. The hospital trust is losing £1 million a week. The trust has accumulated a deficit of £150m (about $240 million).

The P3 fiasco has led some Conservatives to question whether the P3 deals transfer risk to the private sector.

With the announcement, a senior Conservative British MP, Stephen Dorrell (the former health secretary who now chairs the Commons health select committee), suggests that P3 lenders should, like lenders to Greece, bear their share of risk and take "a haircut" when things go wrong.

The Conservative MP adds that private finance initiative "as originally conceived 20 years ago was to achieve some risk transfer, to engage the private sector in making this kind of judgment and to carry some of the risk."

Dorrell regrets that "agreements were signed which effectively paid private sector cost when the public sector took the risk. That is indefensible."

The alleged risk transfer to the private sector is the main way the P3 industry justifies the extra costs associated with P3s.

Mike Farrar, the chief executive of the NHS Confederation noted "To recover the kind of sums you are facing in south London you really do need wholesale redesign of services in order to get something sustainable for the future".

Earlier this year the government announced that 22 trusts were suffering financial problems due to their P3 deals, providing some with extra funding to prevent disaster.

The Department of Health has set goals for twenty trusts overseeing 60 hospitals -- but they may ultimately face special measures similar to the South London hospital trust.

The Telegraph reports there are fears that services such as accident and emergency departments will be cut or downgraded to save money, or that some hospitals could close. Sources close to the health secretary report that the South London's hospital trust’s deficit last year was equal to the salaries of 1,200 nurses or 200 hip replacements a week.

The British P3 model has been exported to other countries, including Canada and Ontario.

Comments

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data. This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization. Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion. That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year. The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million. In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staﬃng. Less and less of hospital spending is on staff. Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development. It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staﬀ per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staﬃng capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics. The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs). With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed. But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea. Following a recent second...

Defend Public Healthcare

Search This Blog