Skip to main content

Hospital workers campaign saves hundreds of lives

It's often said that success has many fathers but failure is a ...., well, it's an orphan.

In this case, however, the campaign by the Ontario Council of Hospital Unions / CUPE on hosptial acquired infections has paid off. OCHU led the campaign for years demanding (among other points) that hospitals be required to report hospital acquired infections.

After repeated campaigns by OCHU, the government began to require hospitals to report on three major hospital acquired infections.

A new study on one of these diseases, C. difficile, has just come out. It shows that public reporting has led to a significant reduction in the incidence of the disease in hospitals.

Below is an editorial from today's Toronto Star commenting on the results of that change in policy and concluding that "Openness isn't just the right thing to do. It saves lives, too.". They suggest about 100 lives per year are being saved

Now if only we could get the Star to fight for another aspect of OCHU's campaign for superbug transparency: that hospitals be required to report the number of deaths associated with hospital acquired infections.



Openness saves lives
Toronto Star
Thu Jul 19 2012
Page: A26
Section: Editorial

Rates of a deadly hospital superbug have dropped by more than one quarter in Ontario since 2008. That translates into about 100 saved lives every year. By any measure, that's great news.

What makes it even better news is that the apparent cause of this dramatic improvement is not some pricey new drug or medical gadget, but a simple move to increased public transparency.

The rates of C. difficile fell after the province made it mandatory for hospitals to publicly report their cases of this hospital-acquired infection, a study released Tuesday found.

It's really quite amazing what can happen when people know they will be publicly held accountable for something. Doctors, nurses and other staff who work in our hospitals have long known what needs to be done to reduce infection rates - hand washing, isolating sick patients and proper room-cleaning procedures are high among them.

But knowing what to do and doing it perfectly each and every time, especially in a hectic hospital environment, aren't quite the same thing. The researchers say Ontario's public reporting requirement helped keep hospitals focused on the problem of C. difficile.

That makes sense. No one ever wants to be at the bottom of the list, especially when the stakes are this high.

Public reporting of outbreaks and infection rates gives all patients and their families the information they should have before going into a hospital. But it also forces hospitals to compare themselves and act accordingly. Those doing well can share their best practices and those doing poorly are prompted to make changes.

Hospitals and, really, most institutions, balk at the prospect of publicly reporting all kinds of data. It's easy to see why. Transparency can lead to moments of embarrassment when an institution falls short of expectations. But this study shows that transparency helps hospitals improve and provide better patient care.

Openness isn't just the right thing to do. It saves lives, too.

© 2012 Torstar Corporation


Edition: ONT
Length: 319 words
Idnumber: 201207190047

Tone: Neutral
Ad Value: $6,305 
Circulation: 361,323 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…