Skip to main content

Ontario government consulting on interest arbitration law

It was less than a year ago that Dalton McGuinty asserted that it was unwise to finagle with the interest arbitration system.

How things have changed.

As noted in June, the government introduced legislation in the recent Budget Bill to make interest arbitration more employer-friendly.  That however failed miserably.

But the Liberals are determined to dig in on this one.  They have promised to bring back new legislation in the fall. Despite McGuinty's earlier wisdom on this issue, they are indeed determined to finagle.

Both the NDP and the Progressive Conservatives opposed the interest arbitration changes, the former because of the bias the legislation introduced, and the latter because the bias did not go far enough (although causing trouble for the Liberals was probably a factor as well).

Now the Ontario Association of Police Services Boards says it has received assurances from the Ministry of Labour that it will be consulted as the new legislation concerning interest arbitration is drafted. The Association adds that it will further be working with members of the opposition parties to push them to come to an agreement on this issue.

Interest arbitration is the only legal way for essential employees (like hospital workers and police officers), who are forbidden by law from striking, to settle collective bargaining disputes.

This comes as both the Progressive Conservatives and the Liberals have hardened their line on collective  bargaining and trade unions.

The Liberals have rapidly increased their demands on public sector workers.  First, they demanded a two year compensation freeze. In the last Budget they added a demand for a reduction in the employer's share of pension payments, where it was over 50%.  Then a compensation freeze wasn't good enough, they also needed concessions in bargaining.  And now they have begun demanding that any agreement lasting over two years also have a compensation freeze for the period over two years.

The PCs go much further,  insisting that the concessions imposed by the Liberals on catholic teachers do not go far enough.

While wage increases were eliminated, the PCs complain that junior teachers will still get  their normal annual increment increases until they reach the top step of their grid.  Although the government had proposed to stop increment increases, the catholic teachers association traded that off for the loss of three paid days for all teachers instead.  The teachers argued that this was more fair as it would not just target junior teachers.  The teachers association also agreed to delay when the teachers get the increment increase by half a school year.

Obscured by the PC rant on the increment increases is that the government benefits as senior teachers -- who reached the top pay step years ago and don't get increment increases -- retire and are replaced by junior teachers who earn far less for years.

Creating more trouble, the PCs also proposed in their recent "White Paper" to remove basic trade union rights won by our grandparents - proposals that would, if implemented, slash trade union membership in both the public and the private sectors  (at least in the short term).

These are the sharpest attacks on collective bargaining and trade unions rights in Ontario for many, many years.

The terrain is changing quickly.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…