Skip to main content

P3 financial crisis forces government to play banker

Oh brother - how bad can the public burden for public private partnerships (P3s) get?

Several years ago, not long after the world-wide financial crisis, OCHU did a campaign warning of the extra costs that would be loaded onto the public through P3s. The financial crisis was driving up the costs of private borrowing and the result would be more costly P3s.

Sure enough, milestone payments by the government were introduced to make it easier for the P3s to obtain sufficient capital to finance the projects. The P3s were becoming P4s: public-public private partnerships, as governments were forced not just to pay for the projects but also to get in on the financing side as well.

Following repeated P3 crises in England, the British government is taking this to all new levels. With private financiers unwilling to stick their necks out for long term loans given the current financial situation, the government has just announced that it is stepping in, not just with milestone payments, but with almost all of the capital for P3 projects starting in the next year.

Here is the comment from Mark Hellowell, an expert on British P3s (or, as the British say, PFIs): "this effectively turns a privately financed programme of social infrastructure delivery into a largely publicly financed one, with the Treasury making clear it is ready to provide virtually all the cash needed to get £6bn worth of projects off the ground over the next 12 months."

These won't just be public projects, however. The Conservative government is going to let the corporations back in for their profits once the private financial markets (and the financiers) calm down.

That's the plan anyway. One can't help but notice, however, that repeated P3 crises are forcing the public sector to play a bigger role.

In Ontario it started with the government requiring public ownership of the facilities right from the get go, then by narrowing the scope of services privatized through P3 projects, then by introducing a new role for public capital through milestone payments as a way to offset the financial crisis in the private sector.

Now the crisis of the private financiers is forcing Britain to take over almost the entire financing role.

"Private Finance Initiative" may need a new name.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…