Skip to main content

Insurance giants look for long-term care business

Giant insurance corporations are pushing into long-term care.

As part of its austerity song book, the Ontario government has pretended that there is no need to expand long-term care, complex continuing care, rehabilitative care, and other forms of care.  If any needs aren't met, it can all be solved, this fairy tale goes, by home care -- even while there isn't much of that going around.  


In that, there is opportunity for corporations.  If government won't insure it, they will - and make a nifty profit doing it. 

As noted in an earlier post, demographic change will drive the growth of long term care for the next several decades.  A recent  insurance industry report estimates that "the cost in current dollars, of providing long-term care over this timeframe (the aging of baby-boomers) is almost $1.2 trillion. Current levels of government program and funding support will cover about $595 billion of this total cost. As a result, Canadians currently have an unfunded liability for long-term care of $590 billion."

The insurance industry estimates that Canadians in long-term care facilities will grow from 300,000 to 750,000 over the next 24 years -- 150% growth.   They suggest that 170 new long term care facilities have to be opened each and every year over the next 35 years (6,000 in total).   (The Conference Board has also estimated that long term care  would grow at about the same rate in Ontario -- from 98,000 residents now to 238,000 in 2035.)

That's a lot of business -- and a lot of money.  It will dwarf the current hospital and long term care industries.   

Naturally, the private insurance giants think they should be involved, via private long term care insurance (and likely other private financial products as well).  Government can't do it all, they warn.  

They recommend that "governments in collaboration with key stakeholders develop an awareness campaign to educate Canadians on the responsibility they will have for funding their own long-term care."  Government (and taxpayers) should drum up business for the insurance industry is perhaps the idea.

The report goes on with recommendations that are decidedly privatization friendly: 
  • Any government funding of long-term care should be directed to individuals rather than funding institutions directly.  
  • Private delivery of long-term care should be encouraged, and
  • Governments should not regulate price for private delivery of service  -- to encourage a vibrant private long-term care market in Canada. 
With government walking away from the care we need, this may well become our reality. Indeed, the long wait lists for publicly funded long-term care and the spotty coverage of home care in Ontario suggest this is already happening.

But does private insurance work for long-term care? More on that later.  

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Huge cuts in public sector wages predicted

The Ontario Financial Accountability Office (FAO)   says  that, with inflation, real wages in the public sector will decline 11.3% over the three year period  2021/2 - 2023/4 .  This would radically deepen the trend towards lower wages during the last ten years.   The FAO reports that since 2011, the average annual salary for the Ontario public sector employees (defined here as employees of schools, colleges, provincial government, provincial agencies, and hospitals) has increased by $10,385   -- or 1.6 per cent on average annually.  This is the lowest increase of all the sectors and lower than inflation, which averaged 1.8 per cent per year. Over the ten years that would be about a 2% pay cut.   The FAO reports that wage settlements were the lowest in the provincial public sector over the last decade:   Hospital Wages Especially Challenged: The FAO predicts hospital wages will increase even less than in the public sector  -- just ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Too many public sector workers in Ontario?

Opponents of public services often try to portray the public sector as having grown disproportionately.  In fact, since 1976, the number of public sector employees has not quite kept pace with the population. In 1976, the number of public sector employees in Ontario  as reported by Statistics Canada averaged 830,800.  By 2012, the number had increased to 1,330,700 -- a 60.2% increase.  That sounds like significant growth -- true. But the population has increased  from 8,413,779 in 1976 to 13,505,900 in 2012, a 60.5% increase.   In other words, population growth has run slightly ahead of the growth in public sector employment.     In 1976, close to 10% of the population worked in the public sector.  It stayed pretty much this way until the Mike Harris government came to power when it dipped below 9%.  It returned close to the historical range in the last six years or so, declining in 2012 to below the 1976 averag...
16 comments
Read more

Are health care administrative expenses out of control in Ontario?

The Progressive Conservative government has justified its health restructuring plans with the claim that administrative expenses are much higher in Ontario than in Canada.  When introducing the reforms, health minister Christine Elliott  claimed , “Over the last five years, Ontario has spent 30% more than the Canadian average in administrative expenses on its health care system.”   Elliott did not indicate her source of information. Presumably, however, the Progressive Conservatives are referring to the CIHI simplified and user friendly “ Your Health System ” graphs. Those graphs show “administrative expenses” in Ontario at 5.8% in Ontario while it is 4.5% in Canada.   This CIHI measure is actually fairly narrowly defined. It is the percentage of “the legal entity’s” total expenses associated with the administrative, finance, human resources and communications functional centres. However “the legal entity” used for this estimate is [1] only...
Post a Comment
Read more