Skip to main content

Insurance giants look for long-term care business

Giant insurance corporations are pushing into long-term care.

As part of its austerity song book, the Ontario government has pretended that there is no need to expand long-term care, complex continuing care, rehabilitative care, and other forms of care.  If any needs aren't met, it can all be solved, this fairy tale goes, by home care -- even while there isn't much of that going around.  


In that, there is opportunity for corporations.  If government won't insure it, they will - and make a nifty profit doing it. 

As noted in an earlier post, demographic change will drive the growth of long term care for the next several decades.  A recent  insurance industry report estimates that "the cost in current dollars, of providing long-term care over this timeframe (the aging of baby-boomers) is almost $1.2 trillion. Current levels of government program and funding support will cover about $595 billion of this total cost. As a result, Canadians currently have an unfunded liability for long-term care of $590 billion."

The insurance industry estimates that Canadians in long-term care facilities will grow from 300,000 to 750,000 over the next 24 years -- 150% growth.   They suggest that 170 new long term care facilities have to be opened each and every year over the next 35 years (6,000 in total).   (The Conference Board has also estimated that long term care  would grow at about the same rate in Ontario -- from 98,000 residents now to 238,000 in 2035.)

That's a lot of business -- and a lot of money.  It will dwarf the current hospital and long term care industries.   

Naturally, the private insurance giants think they should be involved, via private long term care insurance (and likely other private financial products as well).  Government can't do it all, they warn.  

They recommend that "governments in collaboration with key stakeholders develop an awareness campaign to educate Canadians on the responsibility they will have for funding their own long-term care."  Government (and taxpayers) should drum up business for the insurance industry is perhaps the idea.

The report goes on with recommendations that are decidedly privatization friendly: 
  • Any government funding of long-term care should be directed to individuals rather than funding institutions directly.  
  • Private delivery of long-term care should be encouraged, and
  • Governments should not regulate price for private delivery of service  -- to encourage a vibrant private long-term care market in Canada. 
With government walking away from the care we need, this may well become our reality. Indeed, the long wait lists for publicly funded long-term care and the spotty coverage of home care in Ontario suggest this is already happening.

But does private insurance work for long-term care? More on that later.  

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...
Post a Comment
Read more

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staffing.   Less and less of hospital spending is on staff.   Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development.  It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staff per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staffing capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...
Post a Comment
Read more

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics. The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs).  With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.   But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second...
Post a Comment
Read more