Skip to main content

McGuinty: more legislation targeting public sector coming

Attribution: Joshua Sherurcij
The Liberal plan to obtain a majority by targeting public sector workers went askew last night, with the Liberals falling to a distant third place in the Kitchener-Waterloo by-election.

But they are not deterred in their chosen path. After the defeat, Dalton McGuinty promised to continue pushing his current bill imposing concessions on school board workers through the legislature, but also added that his government plans to introduce additional legislation targeting the broader public sector this fall.  “We’ve got to find a way to hit the pause button on public-sector pay rather than make cuts to our services,” he said.


What this might mean is anyone's guess.

Presumably, McGuinty is not yet counting on legislating provincial government 'professional' and 'supervisory' staff -- as they are still in the midst of bargaining.  McGuinty may mean legislation targeting essential service workers -- like hospital workers -- something he failed to get passed with the Budget bill. Or he could be edging in to something more broadly based.


Until now at least, the Liberals (as opposed to the PCs) seem to have recognized that general legislation restricting collective bargaining across the public sector would run afoul of the constitution.

But imposing legislation overriding collective bargaining rights multiple times (bargaining unit by bargaining unit) cannot be an appetizing thought for the Liberals (or even the PCs). It gives working people too many chances to organize against you.


The PCs squarely blamed the unions for their abject failure last night: "Tonight's result has shown that public sector unions from across Ontario were provided with the perfect opportunity to concentrate their resources and lash out against the wage freeze we've been consistently pushing. They bought Kitchener-Waterloo, and now we can expect the rest of Ontario taxpayers to pay for it as the NDP cut more budget deals to keep the Liberals in power."  

Really? We bought Kitchener-Waterloo?  I guess big corporations can only do so much with the measly $500 billion they are sitting on. 

Hudak has more and more focused his strategy on attacking public sector workers and their unions.  So far, at least, that hasn't done him any more good than it has the Liberals -- probably less. 

Here's what the outgoing PC MPP for Kitchener-Waterloo, Elizabeth Witmer, told a journalist shortly before the K-W by-election: "I hear people are unhappy with the McGuinty government. But they also think Tim Hudak is too right wing. So they may vote NDP in protest." 

Hudak was no doubt quite frustrated after last night's shut-out and his rant was pretty far-fetched. So it is not so surprising if at least some Tories point the finger elsewhere. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …