Skip to main content

McGuinty: a second legislative attack on collective bargaining?

Dalton McGuinty has once again inserted himself into the collective bargaining process and given the union representing over 11,000 "professional" and "supervisory" civil servants until September 9th to settle their collective agreement.   

Or else. 

The government and the union, AMAPCEO, have been in bargaining since July 3.  Apparently, the government believes two months is enough bargaining to allow them to fend off any constitutional challenge to legislation overriding free collective bargaining rights. 

The president of AMAPCEO has said that the union has offered a wage freeze, but that the government wants the equivalent of  2% to 3% in cuts of one sort or another. 

As was his method with the teachers, McGuinty talks as if he was simply stopping wage increases, rather than imposing concessions and takeaways (a line often repeated by the media, in their innocence). “We don’t have any money for pay hikes...We may come to a point in time when we can’t resolve that through negotiation. I understand that,” McGuinty said: while on the campaign trail in Kitchener. 

In another kick at this can, McGuinty raised health care contracts as well:  “We can negotiate how to get there, but the ‘there’ is not the subject of negotiation. The ‘there’ represents a freeze in public sector compensation in a way that does not compromise the quality of services we are delivering in our classrooms or in health care.” (As noted in past posts, the Liberals have adopted a very one-sided definition of a compensation freeze.)

Talks with OPSEU, the union representing most provincial  civil servants, are reportedly planned for November (the OPSEU-OPS contract  expires December 31). 

AMAPCEO held a large rally on the lawn of the legislature today (a picture is above), an unusual step for a union of supervisors and professionals.  The union said yesterday that they have "managed to push back most of the Employer’s most draconian demands, like their attacks on our job security provisions."  It had also indicated that it was still optimistic a deal could be reached.  

If not, we may see the introduction of the second bill to override free collective bargaining in as many months.  With many other rounds of collective bargaining in the broader public sector ahead, more could be in store...

Comments

  1. people just dont get it, Dolton doesnt "bargin" he strips away your voices and all rights.

    then we live like a third world country! oh wait he's doing it right now to all of rural ONT. guess your next!

    this lying,sell out of an A$$ has to go!!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…