Skip to main content

Ontario hospitals oppose wage cap

It's not often that Ontario hospitals express opposition to government policy publicly. But the government's new cap on public sector executive pay of $418,000 (annually) has caused them to come out and release a public statement expressing their "extreme disappointment."

"This is another example of the Government of Ontario and legislators devaluing the work and skills of hospital leaders, and those who lead Ontario's vital BPS organizations," the OHA noted.

The Ontario Hospital Association notes that 'only' 77 hospital executives are paid more than $418,000.

But don't worry too much about them, the cap will only apply to new executives -- and even for these new hires, the government has indicated that special exceptions can be made.  Moreover, the bosses aren't getting concessions imposed on them like the school board workers.

Nevertheless, the hospital bosses must be angry -- their rather spirited statement isn't going to curry any favour from government (or the public), I reckon.

The OHA release goes on to suggest that the government should change the Hospital Labour Disputes Arbitration Act (HLDAA--the legislation which governs how arbitrators can set working conditions for unionized hospital workers who are forbidden by law from settling contract disputes through strikes).

They call on the government "to finally and appropriately address this issue which, unlike today's proposal, would have an immediate, noticeable and positive effect supporting restraint in health system spending."

Apparently, their view is that while a cap of  $418,000 is inappropriate for new executives, the government should stick it to experienced hospital workers earning one tenth of that.  

Indeed, even the Liberal Budget bill attack on HLDAA and arbitrators would have "made adverse, costly decisions from arbitrators more likely, not less," according to the OHA.

In fact, those changes would have biased the arbitration system against employees and made it difficult for respected arbitrators to participate in the process. 

Fortunately, the government's proposals failed to pass. But the Liberals have threatened to bring back the legislation in the fall. 

Indeed, the Liberals all but  suggested yesterday that their announcement concerning executive pay will pave the way for  further attacks on collective bargaining in the public sector. Dwight Duncan said other measures affecting public sector workers will be announced "very shortly".

But undermining interest arbitration would be a serious attack on the bargaining process, the main way essential hospital workers can defend their dignity and security at work.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…