Skip to main content

PC plan a threat to small town Ontario?

The Progressive Conservatives (PCs) plan to turn health care funding responsibilities over to 30 to 40 hospitals. These "hub" hospitals would be licensed to move money from one provider in the area to another.

This will leave the other 120 or so hospitals beholden to the hub hospitals for funding.  With funding pressures to the fore, centralization of services is becoming a bigger trend, leaving hospitals in smaller communities especially vulnerable in this funding model.

Douglas Memorial Hospital, Fort Erie
In the last round of PC sponsored restructuring, hospitals in smaller towns and cities were closed and others were merged into multi-site hospital corporations (e.g. the hospitals in the Niagara region).  In the following years, the small hospitals that were merged often lost services to the bigger cities in their multi-site hospital, creating special outrage in Fort Erie, Port Colborne (both in Niagara) Shelburne, and Muskoka, as hospitals in those towns were closed or stripped bare.

Yesterday, the president of the Niagara South Medical Society said he believes program consolidations to the new St. Catharines hospital facility will have a devastating impact on two other smaller Niagara region hospitals serving Niagara Falls and Welland.

“We will be left with a carcass of a hospital which will become a chronic care facility.”

The same centralizing forces are likely to be at play when 30-40 larger hospitals get to determine where services are placed. Indeed the trend will likely be much more so now, as the PC will almost certainly squeeze hospital budgets hard for years to come (just as the Liberals plan to do).

So what towns are at risk of being placed on the second tier?  Under the PC plan, the average hospital hub would look after 330,000-440,000 people.  Given that hospital hubs in larger communities may cover more people and that smaller cities can cover people in the surrounding area, towns with over 100,000 people (e.g. Kingston, Guelph, Sudbury, Thunder Bay) may be safe.  But other smaller communities are at risk.  Here's my list of communities with hospitals at risk:

  • St. Thomas
  • Stratford
  • Belleville
  • Brockville
  • Hawkesbury
  • Pembroke
  • Cornwall
  • North Bay
  • Coburg / Port Hope
  • Collingwood
  • Owen Sound
  • Orillia
  • Smith Falls / Perth
  • Napanee
  • Carleton Place
  • Kemptville
  • Timmins
  • Espanola
  • Dryden
  • Fort Frances
  • Rainy River
  • Woodstock
  • Almonte / Lanark
  • Blind River
  • Wawa
  • Thessalon
  • Kirkland Lake
  • New Liskeard
  • Mattawa
  • Sturgeon Falls
  • Parry Sound
  • Clinton
  • Barry's Bay
  • Winchester
  • Alexandria
  • Owen Sound
  • Wiarton
  • Walkerton
  • Wallaceburg
  • Newbury
  • Strathroy
  • Hanover
  • Ingersol
  • Tilsonburg
  • Huntsville
  • Cambridge
  • Grimsby
  • Lindsay
  • Elliot Lake
  • Alliston
  • Sioux Lookout
  • Orangeville
  • Campbellford
  • Haliburton
  • Midland / Penetang
  • Atikokan
  • Red Lake
  • Geraldton
  • Iroquois Falls
  • Hearst
  • Cochrane
  • Sensenbrenner
  • Smooth Rock
  • Chapleau
  • Chatham-Kent
  • Sarnia
  • Leamington
There's more, but I think the point is clear.  It's especially odd as the PC base is in smaller, rural communities.

This list doesn't include rural hospitals already included in multi-site corporations centred around a large city  (e.g. Niagara Health Sciences, Lakeridge) as they are already in trouble.  It also doesn't include community hospitals in large urban areas that may lose out on hub status to another hospital in a neighboring community.


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…