Skip to main content

PC plan a threat to small town Ontario?

The Progressive Conservatives (PCs) plan to turn health care funding responsibilities over to 30 to 40 hospitals. These "hub" hospitals would be licensed to move money from one provider in the area to another.

This will leave the other 120 or so hospitals beholden to the hub hospitals for funding.  With funding pressures to the fore, centralization of services is becoming a bigger trend, leaving hospitals in smaller communities especially vulnerable in this funding model.

Douglas Memorial Hospital, Fort Erie
In the last round of PC sponsored restructuring, hospitals in smaller towns and cities were closed and others were merged into multi-site hospital corporations (e.g. the hospitals in the Niagara region).  In the following years, the small hospitals that were merged often lost services to the bigger cities in their multi-site hospital, creating special outrage in Fort Erie, Port Colborne (both in Niagara) Shelburne, and Muskoka, as hospitals in those towns were closed or stripped bare.

Yesterday, the president of the Niagara South Medical Society said he believes program consolidations to the new St. Catharines hospital facility will have a devastating impact on two other smaller Niagara region hospitals serving Niagara Falls and Welland.

“We will be left with a carcass of a hospital which will become a chronic care facility.”

The same centralizing forces are likely to be at play when 30-40 larger hospitals get to determine where services are placed. Indeed the trend will likely be much more so now, as the PC will almost certainly squeeze hospital budgets hard for years to come (just as the Liberals plan to do).

So what towns are at risk of being placed on the second tier?  Under the PC plan, the average hospital hub would look after 330,000-440,000 people.  Given that hospital hubs in larger communities may cover more people and that smaller cities can cover people in the surrounding area, towns with over 100,000 people (e.g. Kingston, Guelph, Sudbury, Thunder Bay) may be safe.  But other smaller communities are at risk.  Here's my list of communities with hospitals at risk:


  • St. Thomas
  • Stratford
  • Belleville
  • Brockville
  • Hawkesbury
  • Pembroke
  • Cornwall
  • North Bay
  • Coburg / Port Hope
  • Collingwood
  • Owen Sound
  • Orillia
  • Smith Falls / Perth
  • Napanee
  • Carleton Place
  • Kemptville
  • Timmins
  • Espanola
  • Dryden
  • Fort Frances
  • Rainy River
  • Woodstock
  • Almonte / Lanark
  • Blind River
  • Wawa
  • Thessalon
  • Kirkland Lake
  • New Liskeard
  • Mattawa
  • Sturgeon Falls
  • Parry Sound
  • Clinton
  • Barry's Bay
  • Winchester
  • Alexandria
  • Owen Sound
  • Wiarton
  • Walkerton
  • Wallaceburg
  • Newbury
  • Strathroy
  • Hanover
  • Ingersol
  • Tilsonburg
  • Huntsville
  • Cambridge
  • Grimsby
  • Lindsay
  • Elliot Lake
  • Alliston
  • Sioux Lookout
  • Orangeville
  • Campbellford
  • Haliburton
  • Midland / Penetang
  • Atikokan
  • Red Lake
  • Geraldton
  • Iroquois Falls
  • Hearst
  • Cochrane
  • Sensenbrenner
  • Smooth Rock
  • Chapleau
  • Chatham-Kent
  • Sarnia
  • Leamington
There's more, but I think the point is clear.  It's especially odd as the PC base is in smaller, rural communities.

This list doesn't include rural hospitals already included in multi-site corporations centred around a large city  (e.g. Niagara Health Sciences, Lakeridge) as they are already in trouble.  It also doesn't include community hospitals in large urban areas that may lose out on hub status to another hospital in a neighboring community.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Huge cuts in public sector wages predicted

The Ontario Financial Accountability Office (FAO)   says  that, with inflation, real wages in the public sector will decline 11.3% over the three year period  2021/2 - 2023/4 .  This would radically deepen the trend towards lower wages during the last ten years.   The FAO reports that since 2011, the average annual salary for the Ontario public sector employees (defined here as employees of schools, colleges, provincial government, provincial agencies, and hospitals) has increased by $10,385   -- or 1.6 per cent on average annually.  This is the lowest increase of all the sectors and lower than inflation, which averaged 1.8 per cent per year. Over the ten years that would be about a 2% pay cut.   The FAO reports that wage settlements were the lowest in the provincial public sector over the last decade:   Hospital Wages Especially Challenged: The FAO predicts hospital wages will increase even less than in the public sector  -- just ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Are health care administrative expenses out of control in Ontario?

The Progressive Conservative government has justified its health restructuring plans with the claim that administrative expenses are much higher in Ontario than in Canada.  When introducing the reforms, health minister Christine Elliott  claimed , “Over the last five years, Ontario has spent 30% more than the Canadian average in administrative expenses on its health care system.”   Elliott did not indicate her source of information. Presumably, however, the Progressive Conservatives are referring to the CIHI simplified and user friendly “ Your Health System ” graphs. Those graphs show “administrative expenses” in Ontario at 5.8% in Ontario while it is 4.5% in Canada.   This CIHI measure is actually fairly narrowly defined. It is the percentage of “the legal entity’s” total expenses associated with the administrative, finance, human resources and communications functional centres. However “the legal entity” used for this estimate is [1] only...
Post a Comment
Read more

Too many public sector workers in Ontario?

Opponents of public services often try to portray the public sector as having grown disproportionately.  In fact, since 1976, the number of public sector employees has not quite kept pace with the population. In 1976, the number of public sector employees in Ontario  as reported by Statistics Canada averaged 830,800.  By 2012, the number had increased to 1,330,700 -- a 60.2% increase.  That sounds like significant growth -- true. But the population has increased  from 8,413,779 in 1976 to 13,505,900 in 2012, a 60.5% increase.   In other words, population growth has run slightly ahead of the growth in public sector employment.     In 1976, close to 10% of the population worked in the public sector.  It stayed pretty much this way until the Mike Harris government came to power when it dipped below 9%.  It returned close to the historical range in the last six years or so, declining in 2012 to below the 1976 averag...
16 comments
Read more