Skip to main content

Finding appropriate care for ALC patients in hospital

Today, in the Ottawa Citizen, the Queensway Carleton Hospital reports a big decline in the number of  "ALC" patients, down  from 50 patients a day to 20 or 25.  That is a  50% to 60% decline.

Queensway Carleton Hospital
The story highlights the home first program (where seniors get intensive home care for up to two months) and a decision not to discuss LTC options with patients, or fill in LTC applications.  

It sounds like a more important explanation of the ALC decline was the creation of 24 "restorative" beds at the hospital.   The patients in those beds are the same sort of patients who were formerly ALC (i.e. not requiring acute care but still not ready to go home).   With the creation of the restorative beds program there are now special programs to help these patients become fit and active while they fully recover in hospital.

With this program, these patients are no longer in acute care beds and are no longer waiting for another form or care. As a result they are no longer "ALC".  They have found their appropriate level of care -- in the hospital.

With 24 restorative beds, 24 patients are no longer waiting to go elsewhere. Restorative hospital care would appear to account for almost the entire reduction reported (i.e. 24 of the 25 to 30 bed reduction). 

Note, however, this program did not increase the  number of beds very much.   It appears the program was started in December 2010 – and at that time the number of acute care beds decreased 11 from 211 to 200.  At the same time “Rehabilitation” beds increase from 25 to 38, an increase of 13.  So  apparently some  acute care beds and rehabilitation beds were changed to “restorative” rehabilitation beds. The occupancy of the rehabilitation beds also increased sharply.  In total, bed numbers increased by two.  

Oddly, the current Queensway Carleton target is to have 20% of patients designated ALC.  With 262 beds, that would mean an average of  52 ALC patients, far higher than what they have suggested to the Citizen.  What accounts for this discrepancy remains unclear to me.  

The Citizen also reports a smaller decline in the number of people waiting for a long-term care beds.  That is down 12.4% since September 2011, from 2,672 to 2,341.  This, however, sounds directly related to the decision of the hospital not to discuss LTC options with patients or fill in LTC applications.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…