Skip to main content

P3 costs rise as scandal sours investors

The Washington Post reports that the sales "of Canadian project-finance bonds are lower this year as an ongoing investigation of alleged corruption in the Quebec construction industry makes the debt more expensive to issue."

The American paper adds that the "inquiry into corruption in the Quebec construction industry, which led to the resignation of Montreal Mayor Gerald Tremblay on Nov. 5, is souring sentiment among investors in private-public partnership bonds linked to projects for hospitals and universities in Canada’s second-largest province."

The McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) P3 project is now under police investigation. The National Post reports that questions are being raised whether "illicit cash payments helped the SNC-Lavalin consortium win the MUHC contract."

Three weeks ago the police raided the downtown headquarters of the MUHC. The National Post notes one unconfirmed report alleged that there was a secret $22.5 million payment that involved the MUHC. The CEO of the MUHC has resigned and left "for parts unknown." The chair of the MUHC board also resigned. And he too isn't talking.  The editorialists at the Montreal Gazette adds this of the giant corporation that headed the P3 bid: 
"Riahd Ben Aissa, who headed the company’s construction division and was its original point man for the MUHC project, was arrested earlier this year in Switzerland in connection with allegations of corrupt practices unrelated to MUHC work.  Also of concern is that the firm hired to excavate the land at the hospital’s Glen Yard site, Louisbourg SBC SEC, was headed by construction magnate Tony Accurso, who currently faces charges of fraud, corruption, bribery and conspiracy. His firms have previously been guilty of tax evasion....Further investigation into the matter by The Gazette’s Aaron Derfel has revealed a number of anomalies in the bidding process. These include rules of secrecy that prevent an open examination of the bids to loopholes that allowed major partners in the consortium to bid on both the McGill as well as the Université de Montréal hospital projects at the same time — against PPP rules in Quebec that said they could only bid on one of the two. Derfel’s reporting has also cast light on a rule of secrecy that prohibits public disclosure of people who sat on selection committees that reviewed bids for the hospital contract. With the exception of Porter and former MUHC board chairman David Angus, whose names were inadvertently made public, it is still not known who exactly participated in the process."

“You’ll see that spreads on the McGill (University Health Centre) notes have widened since the scandal,” says John Braive, vice chairman of CIBC Global Asset Management. “It has a lot to do with what’s going on with the construction inquiry in Montreal, so that’s been a bit of concern.”

Braive also notes that issuance in the public-private market has “really slowed” because hospital construction in Ontario has slowed as well as the Quebec corruption probe.

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.

The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …