Skip to main content

More cuts to Ontario deficit coming in January

Dwight Duncan
The Ontario government's recent Fall Economic Statement retroactively confirmed that the 2011-12 deficit was $2 billion less than set out in the 2012 provincial budget. It also lopped $400 million off the 2012-13 deficit.

Our economic elites thought this was no big deal -- there was a "lack of significant progress" the TD Bank said. (See TD's report here and the chart "Fiscal profile largely the same for the Ontario government" )

But just those cuts in the deficits are equivalent to $1 billion more than the $1.4 billion the government hopes to save through the first year of its  "provincial compensation framework" announced in July.

The   $2.4 billion reduction in the Fall Economic Outlook is just the latest in a long series of reductions since the 2010 Budget -- $13.5 billion in total.

  
Deficit (in billions of dollars)
2009–10
2010–11
2011–12
2012–13
Total
2010 Budget
21.3
19.7
17.3
15.9
74.2
2012 Fall Economic Statement
19.3
14
13
14.4
60.7
Reduction in Deficit
2
5.7
4.3
1.5
13.5

Despite this (and despite that it was apparent the major part of the government's planned compensation savings were already achievable) Premier McGuinty and Finance Minister Dwight Duncan launched their fateful legislative attack on collective bargaining in the broader public sector.

More Deficit Cuts?
Earlier this week, outgoing Finance Minister Duncan (while pleading for the new Liberal leaders to stick with his policies) suggested that he will announce new deficit numbers in January.  This will likely continue Duncan's tradition: we will be told the deficit is smaller than previously announced.  (Despite growth and little new spending, Duncan's Ministry somehow estimated that the deficit will be $1.4 B higher this year than last year in the recent Fall Economic Statement.)

This will also allow Duncan to grab credit for a reduced deficit before he goes, likely shortly after the January 26 leadership contest vote.

But don't expect the Duncan (or the banks) to suggest that any adjustment in the deficit should mean any adjustment in policy on free collective bargaining.

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.







The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…