Skip to main content

Major decline in nursing in Ontario hospitals



There was a sharp reduction in the number of Registered Nurses (RNs) working in Ontario hospitals in 2011, with a cut of 2,750 RNs to 58,699 according to new CIHI data.  That's a 4.47% decrease in one year.  Community health numbers also took a very hard hit, while numbers were up very slightly in long-term care.

For the first time in a long time the number of Registered Nurses (RNs) in Ontario has begun to decline.  In 2011, employed RNs declined from 95,185 to 94,723, a  decrease of  462, or just less than one-half of one percent.

Registered Practical Nurses (RPN) continue to increase in numbers overall, up 1,023 from 2010, or 3.36%.

Accordingly, the ratio between RNs and RPNs in Ontario has declined from 3.52 employed RN per employed RPN in 2004, to 3.01 RN per RPN.  While this relative decline mimics a country-wide trend, RN numbers across the country still continued to increase in 2011 (from 268,512 in 2010 to 270,724 in 2011).

The overall numbers, however, hide the fact that work in the main parts of health care is declining for all nurses -- RN and RPN alike.

There was a decline in the number of RPNs working in hospitals in Ontario, with the numbers declining from 13,373 in 2010 to 13,126 in 2011.  That's a decline of 247 RPNs  -- or a loss of 1.8% in one-year.

RPN employment in community health declined somewhat and rose slightly in long-term care.

Almost all of the increase in RPN employment was in the ill-defined category "Other Place of Work".  This category lumps together employment with private nursing agencies, private duty nurses, doctors offices, educational institutes, private/business /occupational health offices, as well as those self-employed.  This category also increased sharply for RNs.

All told, the decline in the number of nurses (RN and RPN) in Ontario hospitals in 2011 was a shocking 2,997.  Community health lost 2,144 RNs and RPNs.   LTC saw modest growth (530 more RNs and RPNs).  But the "Other Place of Work" category saw a whopping increase of 3,406 RPNs and RNs - -about a 30% increase.

It appears that employment numbers are declining in the unionized (and, likely, best paid) health care sub-sectors, while it is increasing in less-traditional, non-unionized (and, likely, poorly paid) sub-sectors.

Still, RPN numbers in hospitals, LTC and community health care are well up compared with 2007.  For RNs the picture is more mixed, with a modest increase in hospital employment, a modest decline in LTC, and a sharper decline in community health since 2007.

Also positive, there has been a rapid increase in the number of RPNs employed full-time, with a 33.8% increase since 2007.  In 2011 alone there was an 8.9% increase in RPNs employed full time. It remains unclear from the published data which sub-sectors are underwriting the increase in full-time employment.

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.







The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…