Skip to main content

It's OK to close hospital beds



Aside from the predictable (but fun) response from Deb Matthews to yesterday's Ontario Health Coalition report outlining cuts in Ontario hospitals ("It is OK" to close hospital beds, she opined), we did get a snippet or two of information from the government. 

The Star reports the Health Minister's office also made these claims:

  • 70 per cent of hospitals have seen increases  -- 63 hospitals.  This is inaccurate in some way. There are about 159 hospital corporations in Ontario (there's many more hospital facilities).  So if 63 is accurate, that would be 39% of hospital corporations got an increase.  If it is 70%, that would be about 111 hospital corporations. So somebody got the math wrong.
  • The largest decrease that a hospital has received is 1.2 per cent and the largest increase is 2.8 per cent.
  • About 81 per cent of hospitals have seen no more than a 1 per cent swing, up or down. So, if this is true, the large majority of hospitals got either a very small absolute increase or a very small absolute decrease in funding. Still there was no reported comment on the overall change in hospital funding -- since the LHINs were created that has been obscured by the division between LHIN and other forms of hospital funding.
The government's claim that it is increasing overall health care funding ignores the fact that costs are increasing due to increasing population, aging, inflation, and increased utilization.  So, their modest increase in nominal funding means a decrease in real funding -- and, as a result, in health care service.  The Ontario Auditor General cites 6-7% cost pressures for health care, far, far more than actual health care funding. So, for example, even if all the hospitals got a nominal 1% increase, that is a long way off the actual cost pressures they are facing.

Notably, even obedient hospital bosses have, of late, made some concession toward the idea that the cuts they are being forced to impose may mean a reduction in service.  But not the Health Minister.  Not yet, anyway.

By the way, here is the Health Coalition's tart reply on the issue of, alleged, improvements in home and community care offsetting the cuts to hospitals:

“Under the required deficit-elimination plans, hospital beds are being closed down in significant numbers. Hospital services are being cut. Plans for unprecedented privatization of surgeries, diagnostics and therapies are being revealed. Despite the rhetoric of the health minister and our new premier (Kathleen Wynne), these services are not being replaced in non-profit community and home care. They are being cut and privatized.”

Quite right.  

Health Minister Deb Matthews. Photo: London Public Library

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.







The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…