Skip to main content

Management wage increases dwarf others

Earlier I noted that while the provincial government was imposing concessions (and, yes, of course, wage freezes) on unionized public sector workers, the Conference Board of Canada was predicting 2.7% increases for non-union employees in Ontario in 2013 (up from 2.6% actual increases in 2012).

Now, Statistics Canada data suggests this may be part of a long term trend.  Data in a new report indicates that in Canada between 1998 and 2011 the hourly wages of full time management occupations went up 34.7% in real terms (i.e. after accounting for inflation).  

The rest did much worse.  "Health occupations" saw a 3.8% real increase.  That is about a quarter of one percent per year -- management occupations did about  nine times better.  "Social Sciences, education, and government service" did worse still with a 2.5% increase over the 13 years. 

Worst of all? "Occupations unique to processing, manufacturing, and utilities" at 1.5%. 

Outside of management, "occupations unique to primary industries" increased the most at 15% (driven, reportedly by increasing demand for commodities like oil and copper). 

Median hourly wages
1998
2011
Change
(In 2010 dollars)
(In 2010 dollars)
%
Management occupations
24.87
33.5
34.7
Business, finance, and administrative occupations
19.14
19.86
3.8
Natural sciences, applied sciences, and related
26.17
29.79
13.8
Health occupations
22.97
23.84
3.8
Social sciences, education, government service
26.64
27.32
2.5
Sales and service occupations
13.72
14.52
5.9
Trades, transport, and equipment operators
20.42
21.3
4.3
Occupations unique to primary industry
14.04
16.14
15
Occupations unique to processing, manufacturing, and utilities
17.03
17.24
1.2

Gross Domestic Product per capita increased 18.6% in real terms from July 1998 to July 2011, so obviously someone was getting a significant increase.  Apparently that included managers (whose percentage hourly wage increase was almost double the percentage growth in per capita GDP).  

But health care workers, government employees, and education workers (i.e. targets of government austerity) have fallen far behind.

I'm sometimes accused of providing nothing but bad news.  So the good news? Unionized workers (public and private) did a little better.  According to other Stats Can data drawing on the Labour Force Survey, full time, unionized men saw wages increase 6.5% in real terms, while full time, unionized women saw an 11.4% increase. That doesn't keep pace with the growth in the economy, and still falls well short of management wage increases, but it is better than many other workers have seen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ford Plans to Cut Health Care Worker Benefits by $250 million

Attack on health care worker benefits: The Ontario Ford government has specifically targeted in the Budget health care worker compensation  through cuts in premium payments (e.g. shift payments), overtime, and sick leave. "Improving" scheduling is also part of the plan.  The stated goalis to cut $250 million annually through such changes by 2021-22.

This is squarely aimed at hourly paid employees. Managers don't get overtime and premium payments, and they are not likely to be targeted by attendance management programs or scheduling "improvements". 

With about half a million hourly paid employees working in health care a $250 million cut would mean about a cut of about $500 per employee per year.  

The Ford government claims in the Budget that this will have "no impact on patient care or front-line staff."

In fact, a $500 cut may be low -- as it will be especially hard to harvest such amounts from contracted, for-profit corporations (e.g. in home care).  T…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…

Are health care administrative expenses out of control in Ontario?

The Progressive Conservative government has justified its health restructuring plans with the claim that administrative expenses are much higher in Ontario than in Canada. 
When introducing the reforms, health minister Christine Elliott claimed, “Over the last five years, Ontario has spent 30% more than the Canadian average in administrative expenses on its health care system.”  
Elliott did not indicate her source of information. Presumably, however, the Progressive Conservatives are referring to the CIHI simplified and user friendly “Your Health System” graphs. Those graphs show “administrative expenses” in Ontario at 5.8% in Ontario while it is 4.5% in Canada.  
This CIHI measure is actually fairly narrowly defined. It is the percentage of “the legal entity’s” total expenses associated with the administrative, finance, human resources and communications functional centres.
However “the legal entity” used for this estimate is [1] only for certain types of health care providers, and [2] …