Skip to main content

Management wage increases dwarf others

Earlier I noted that while the provincial government was imposing concessions (and, yes, of course, wage freezes) on unionized public sector workers, the Conference Board of Canada was predicting 2.7% increases for non-union employees in Ontario in 2013 (up from 2.6% actual increases in 2012).

Now, Statistics Canada data suggests this may be part of a long term trend.  Data in a new report indicates that in Canada between 1998 and 2011 the hourly wages of full time management occupations went up 34.7% in real terms (i.e. after accounting for inflation).  

The rest did much worse.  "Health occupations" saw a 3.8% real increase.  That is about a quarter of one percent per year -- management occupations did about  nine times better.  "Social Sciences, education, and government service" did worse still with a 2.5% increase over the 13 years. 

Worst of all? "Occupations unique to processing, manufacturing, and utilities" at 1.5%. 

Outside of management, "occupations unique to primary industries" increased the most at 15% (driven, reportedly by increasing demand for commodities like oil and copper). 

Median hourly wages
1998
2011
Change
(In 2010 dollars)
(In 2010 dollars)
%
Management occupations
24.87
33.5
34.7
Business, finance, and administrative occupations
19.14
19.86
3.8
Natural sciences, applied sciences, and related
26.17
29.79
13.8
Health occupations
22.97
23.84
3.8
Social sciences, education, government service
26.64
27.32
2.5
Sales and service occupations
13.72
14.52
5.9
Trades, transport, and equipment operators
20.42
21.3
4.3
Occupations unique to primary industry
14.04
16.14
15
Occupations unique to processing, manufacturing, and utilities
17.03
17.24
1.2

Gross Domestic Product per capita increased 18.6% in real terms from July 1998 to July 2011, so obviously someone was getting a significant increase.  Apparently that included managers (whose percentage hourly wage increase was almost double the percentage growth in per capita GDP).  

But health care workers, government employees, and education workers (i.e. targets of government austerity) have fallen far behind.

I'm sometimes accused of providing nothing but bad news.  So the good news? Unionized workers (public and private) did a little better.  According to other Stats Can data drawing on the Labour Force Survey, full time, unionized men saw wages increase 6.5% in real terms, while full time, unionized women saw an 11.4% increase. That doesn't keep pace with the growth in the economy, and still falls well short of management wage increases, but it is better than many other workers have seen.

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.







The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…