Skip to main content

Secrecy, Privatization & the Dilution of Public Accountability: the Chemotherapy Scandal


Martin Regg Cohn, Queen's Park columnist for the Toronto Star,  expressed his outrage at some length today at the College of Pharmacists.  Apparently, they did not answer media questions about the diluted chemotherapy drug scandal quickly enough.

But he says nothing of the response from the private corporation that actually mixed the chemotherapy drugs That company has -- according to the Star's sister paper, the Spectator -- repeatedly refused interview requests and refers questions to the Ministry of Health and LTC.  Early on, it reportedly threatened legal action if its name was mentioned and suggested the problem lay elsewhere.  As one CEO at an affected hospital said yesterday “They have not been forthcoming, for whatever reason, with a lot of information.”

This illustrates a key difference between public bodies and private corporations -- the former are expected by the public and the media to be open, the latter, not at all. 

So when you privatize public services, expect the latter. They are, after all, private corporations, run for private interests  -- even when funded by public money.

More Privatization Issues...
The Ontario College of Pharmacists now says the private company is not even licensed as an accredited  pharmacy. 

The privatization of the mixing of chemotherapy drugs is relatively new -- just like the privatization of many other aspects of health care that are being encouraged by the current government (e.g. private surgical clinics, P3 hospitals, and the replacement of public hospital and public long-term care services by private home care and private retirement homes).  Even those who support such privatization expect the government to have figured out basic oversight and public accountability before charging ahead with privatization.


But apparently not.      

The number of Ontario government scandals driven in large part by privatization just keeps growing and growing: the  Brampton P3 hospital, e-Health, the gas plant, Ornge – it’s hard to think of one that is not.


But the lessons learned by the government?  Not much -- just vein hopes to figure out how to privatize better next time. So expect more problems.

Update 12/04/13: Sure enough, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne has promised better oversight of privatized companies providing chemotherapy mixtures, suggesting that Health Canada and the College of Pharmacists are working on this.  But she won't tell hospitals to bring the work back in house.  

As, with past privatization fiascos, the Liberals are vowing to do privatization better -- next time. 

Photo: Slow Poison, Slow Cure by Unhindered by Talent

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…