Skip to main content

Secrecy, Privatization & the Dilution of Public Accountability: the Chemotherapy Scandal


Martin Regg Cohn, Queen's Park columnist for the Toronto Star,  expressed his outrage at some length today at the College of Pharmacists.  Apparently, they did not answer media questions about the diluted chemotherapy drug scandal quickly enough.

But he says nothing of the response from the private corporation that actually mixed the chemotherapy drugs That company has -- according to the Star's sister paper, the Spectator -- repeatedly refused interview requests and refers questions to the Ministry of Health and LTC.  Early on, it reportedly threatened legal action if its name was mentioned and suggested the problem lay elsewhere.  As one CEO at an affected hospital said yesterday “They have not been forthcoming, for whatever reason, with a lot of information.”

This illustrates a key difference between public bodies and private corporations -- the former are expected by the public and the media to be open, the latter, not at all. 

So when you privatize public services, expect the latter. They are, after all, private corporations, run for private interests  -- even when funded by public money.

 More Privatization Issues...
The Ontario College of Pharmacists now says the private company is not even licensed as an accredited  pharmacy. 

 The privatization of the mixing of chemotherapy drugs is relatively new -- just like the privatization of many other aspects of health care that are being encouraged by the current government (e.g. private surgical clinics, P3 hospitals, and the replacement of public hospital and public long-term care services by private home care and private retirement homes).  Even those who support such privatization expect the government to have figured out basic oversight and public accountability before charging ahead with privatization.

 But apparently not.      

 The number of Ontario government scandals driven in large part by privatization just keeps growing and growing: the  Brampton P3 hospital, e-Health, the gas plant, Ornge – it’s hard to think of one that is not.

But the lessons learned by the government?  Not much -- just vein hopes to figure out how to privatize better next time. So expect more problems.

 Update 12/04/13: Sure enough, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne has promised better oversight of privatized companies providing chemotherapy mixtures, suggesting that Health Canada and the College of Pharmacists are working on this.  But she won't tell hospitals to bring the work back in house.  

 As, with past privatization fiascos, the Liberals are vowing to do privatization better -- next time. 

Photo: Slow Poison, Slow Cure by Unhindered by Talent
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...
Post a Comment
Read more

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staffing.   Less and less of hospital spending is on staff.   Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development.  It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staff per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staffing capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...
Post a Comment
Read more

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics. The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs).  With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.   But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second...
Post a Comment
Read more