Skip to main content

Government promise of 60 hospital beds for Windsor is much less than it seems

The Ontario government has finally taken some steps to respond to the long-standing problem of bed shortages in Windsor, promising 60 new beds.  Quite a turn-around, given the full-on attack on hospital services that characterizes much of government health policy.

There has been a whole stream of hospital back-up problems in Windsor -- the elimination of 120 hospital beds between  1996 and 2010,  a major increase in ambulance off-load delays, an attempt to impose an illegal $600 a day charge on hospital patients,  an officially recognized bed crisis, the failure of a public-private partnership long term care project, and, most recently, the failed attempt to create 18 hospital beds in a for-profit retirement home.

It's not clear what finally got the government to make such a promise.

They have promised 30 inpatient beds and 10 rehabilitation beds for Windsor. 

They have also promised twenty "short stay" beds -- but it is not clear (to me) if these are supposed to replace the 18 "assess and restore" hospital beds that were previously promised for the for-profit retirement home.  Assess and restore hospital beds can help patients recover in hospital after an acute episode enabling them to return home when they are ready (a plus for a government bent on stopping patients from moving into long-term care facilities, I reckon).

New beds don't make up loses
But even this major step is much less than it seems.  The Windsor Star helpfully reports that the addition of 60 beds will bring the hospital to 610 beds in 2013.  What is not reported, however, is that this is 59 fewer beds than the 669 beds the hospital reported in 2010.

Even 610 beds may be an exaggeration -- the hospital currently claims only 523 beds on its web site. Sixty more would leave them at 583, 86 fewer beds than 2010. That's a lot of beds to lose in three years.

Wage freeze
In other Windsor news, the chair of the Regional Hospital board worried the cap on wages for non-union employees would hamper recruitment:  “This has to be monitored to ensure our fiscal responsibility does not interfere with being able to recruit and retain staff in order to continue being an employer of choice."  

The hospital CEO (who rarely seems to miss a chance to speak to the media) helpfully added that a "1% wage increase for all WRH staff would cost $2 million dollars to implement. For senior staff 1% increase is $15,000."   This from the guy who complains relentlessly about the wages paid to his unionized employees and the interest arbitration system that helps set those wages.

Chemotherapy contracted-in
The good news? After the recent discovery that chemotherapy drugs supplied by a private contractor for 290 Windsor Regional patients were watered down, the hospital has brought the work back into their own hospital pharmacy (at least for now). The hospital CEO declined to name the company involved, saying that the company had threatened legal action if they were named publicly. Cancer patients are planning their own lawsuits as well. Seventeen of the Windsor patients affected have died, although it is unknown if this was connected to the chemo drug problems.
Photo: The Detroit River ice thaws -- looking over  to Windsor,  DTWpuck


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…