Skip to main content

Ontario Finance Minister plans cuts in public services

The Ontario government just lopped another $2.1 billion off their 2012-13 deficit estimate, cutting it from $11.9 billion (as of January) to $9.8 billion. This means that since 2010 when they started their public sector austerity drive, they have now cut their deficit estimates by $18.1 billion.

Deficit (in billions of dollars)
2010 Budget
2013 April
Reduction in Deficit (billions)


Since the 2012 Budget, the government has repeatedly cuts its deficit forecast for 2012-13.  It started this year estimating a $15.2 billion deficit (just slightly lower than it estimated in 2010, as noted above). It now puts the deficit at a whopping $5.4 billion less.

That is one mighty big error over the course of just one year.

To put it in perspective, the government only hoped to save $8.8 billion over 3 years through the wage freeze and concessions it proposed for public sector workers last summer.

The attack on collective bargaining by the McGuinty government led to a lot of trouble and disruption for savings that were being achieved largely through other means -- and at a faster rate.

Despite the consistent write down of the deficit during the course of the fiscal year, the McGuinty /Duncan government (for political reasons) intensified its attacks on public sector workers and collective bargaining, changing its position last summer from demands for a two year wage freeze to one where it demanded concessions (as well as the wage freeze).

Perhaps the Wynne government has dialed it down a bit on free collective bargaining.  But will it do likewise on public services? Comments from the new Minister of Finance, Charles Sousa, suggest otherwise.  He told  (who else?) a corporate crowd yesterday that he would deliver a funding increase of  less than 1%.  

That would actually be a cut from Dwight Duncan's budget last year.  There, total spending was supposed to increase 1.4%  (with program spending budgeted to increase 1.2% --see Budget table 2.31 ). In the previous year, 2011-12, total spending increased 2.8%, and in 2010-11 spending increased 4.9%.

With the population growing about 1.15% per year and inflation estimated for this year and the next two at 2% by the Ontario government, a spending increase of less than 1% would mean a very significant real decrease in public services --  even assuming ambitious efficiency gains.

Indeed, the nominal funding increase proposed for 2013-14 is worse than last year under Dwight Duncan. And if inflation does goes higher...

Photo: ammiiirrr


  1. What are the benefits from Ontario Finance Minister plans to the public or public services.And how they are relax from their attacks.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ford Plans to Cut Health Care Worker Benefits by $250 million

Attack on health care worker benefits: The Ontario Ford government has specifically targeted in the Budget health care worker compensation  through cuts in premium payments (e.g. shift payments), overtime, and sick leave. "Improving" scheduling is also part of the plan.  The stated goalis to cut $250 million annually through such changes by 2021-22.

This is squarely aimed at hourly paid employees. Managers don't get overtime and premium payments, and they are not likely to be targeted by attendance management programs or scheduling "improvements". 

With about half a million hourly paid employees working in health care a $250 million cut would mean about a cut of about $500 per employee per year.  

The Ford government claims in the Budget that this will have "no impact on patient care or front-line staff."

In fact, a $500 cut may be low -- as it will be especially hard to harvest such amounts from contracted, for-profit corporations (e.g. in home care).  T…

Are health care administrative expenses out of control in Ontario?

The Progressive Conservative government has justified its health restructuring plans with the claim that administrative expenses are much higher in Ontario than in Canada. 
When introducing the reforms, health minister Christine Elliott claimed, “Over the last five years, Ontario has spent 30% more than the Canadian average in administrative expenses on its health care system.”  
Elliott did not indicate her source of information. Presumably, however, the Progressive Conservatives are referring to the CIHI simplified and user friendly “Your Health System” graphs. Those graphs show “administrative expenses” in Ontario at 5.8% in Ontario while it is 4.5% in Canada.  
This CIHI measure is actually fairly narrowly defined. It is the percentage of “the legal entity’s” total expenses associated with the administrative, finance, human resources and communications functional centres.
However “the legal entity” used for this estimate is [1] only for certain types of health care providers, and [2] …

Health Care Funding Means Cuts are Coming (and its Armageddon for other programs)

The group that will do the best out of the recent provincial Budget are the doctors.  According to the just released Budget Estimates, OHIP funding (which  goes overwhelmingly to physicians and practitioners) will go up $1.2 billion or 8% compared to last year's Estimates. 

(Note -- this is a little different, and less accurate, than the comparisons with last year's interim amounts reported in the 2019 Budget and used elsewhere in this note.  It is the only comparison publicly available for OHIP as of the moment, however. The Financial Accountability Office has suggested that the actual OHIP spend last year would be less than in the Estimates by several hundred million. So the actual increase this year may be larger than $1.2 billion. We will know for sure when the Public Accounts finalize the books for 2018-19 in September.)  

This large increase is likely due to the February 2019 interest arbitration award for doctors, an award that was praised as "fair" by Christine…