Skip to main content

Ontario P3 fiasco: $90 million cost to finance $59 million loan



The majority of the costs reported by the Auditor General for the cancellation of the Mississauga gas plant were payments to the U.S. based investment firm that provided financing for the project -- $149.6 million.

The private company doing the project (Greenfield) negotiated expensive financing for the project with this U.S. investment firm -- 14% annual interest. Compared to the cost of public financing, that is through the roof, perhaps 7 or 8 times higher.

The Auditor General confirms this interest rate, and adds that "Penalties for Greenfield’s defaulting on the agreement were heavy: Greenfield would have to immediately pay back all amounts drawn with interest, as well as interest on the full undrawn amount for the full eight-year term of the agree­ment."

Worse, "the OPA (the Ontario Power Authority, which was acting for the government after it decided to cancel the project) was unaware of any of these onerous penalty terms when it signed a November 25, 2011, interim agreement to pay the costs for releasing Greenfield from its lender. The OPA told us that it had asked Greenfield for its lending agreement but that Greenfield refused to provide it. The OPA still proceeded to sign the interim agreement, undoubt­edly owing to the urgency of getting Greenfield to stop construction."

The Auditor adds, "A key legal issue was whether paying the equivalent of 14% interest for eight years on the full $263-million line of credit would exceed the legal maximum 'criminal rate' of interest that could be charged".

In the end the government agreed to pay the U.S. financier $90 million in penalty interest. 

Greenfield had only drawn $59 million in loans.

It's not reported by the media that this project is a public private partnership (P3)-- but that it clearly is. This is the policy the government is plowing billions of dollars into for hospital facilities and other public infrastructure. The Auditor General has already shown all sorts of extra costs associated with the Brampton P3 hospital.

The results of this P3? Incredibly high interest rates, onerous cancellation penalties, and $90 million in penalty interest for $59 million drawn in loan.

Perhaps even worse, the government was kept in the dark about the high interest rates and the onerous cancellation charges. And to get the construction to stop, it had to agree to cover these costs -- without even knowing what they would be!

Over 9,000 people voted in Kingston on Saturday to say NO to a privatized P3 hospital in a plebiscite organized by the Ontario Health Coalition.  A lot is at stake. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…