Skip to main content

Ambulances and Public Health get cash (while other sectors starve)

From time to time there are rumors that EMS (ambulance services) and municipal public health services may move over to the tender mercies of the Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs), which fund hospitals, home care, long term care, and other health services.

Fortunately-- for these services -- that has not happened yet.  

The government is starving the LHINs.  According to the recently released Budget Estimates, the LHINs are going to get $300 million less than what they got two years ago.

In contrast, public health services (provided by municipalities but funded to a considerable extent by the province) are budgeted to get about a 6.4% increase from the provincial coffers this year.   Over the last two years the increase is 12.2%. 

Not too bad.

"Emergency Health Services" (aka EMS) are also largely provided by municipalities but funded almost 50% by the province.  And EMS has also done okay, with a 3.8% increase this year according to the Estimates. Over the last two years, the increase is an impressive 9.2%, continuing a long trend that has seen big increases for ambulances. 

While the increases are significant, the funding for EMS and public health remains small potatoes compared to what the LHINs get -- at about $1.5 billion together they are about 6.5% of the LHIN budget.  

But they are big enough that they might help ease the pain of a $300 million cut.  

Bottom line for EMS and public health:  if the Borg ever gets them in its mitts, they might look like tempting little morsels. 

Provincial Programs: With most of the new Budget money going to the doctors, the tradition of handing over major increases to the murky Budget line item called "Provincial Programs" (and especially the sub-line item "Community and Priority Services") has come to an end.  

The total increase here is a measly $42 million -- a little more than a 1% increase, about the same as the overall increase for health care.   The previous year saw a $1.5 billion increase to this line item (an eye-popping 69% increase).  

Effectively the government had put the LHINs in charge of saying no to everyone, while leaving themselves some cash to play with.  

Now? Not so much. 

Photo by Xiaozhuli .  The Ottawa EMS base.

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.

The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…