Skip to main content

Why are fewer hospital patients waiting for LTC?


Ontario hospitals report a significant decline in the number of patients in hospital beds who are waiting for a long term care bed.  This has been the main category of the so-called "hospital bed blocker" -- the Alternative Level of Care (ALC) hospital patient -- so it is a significant change.  From November 2009 to March 2013, the number of patients waiting for LTC was reduced by 1,282 patients, an astonishing decline of 41%.

This sounds like a victory for better management, but the real story appears to be more complex.

This has not happened because a decline in the relevant population. As noted earlier, the 85 and older population is growing very quickly.

Instead, this coincides with a decline in the number of people (at home and in the hospitals) on long-term care waiting lists of 5,000.  As of 2012, we are down to only 32,000 people in total waiting for a long-term care bed, according to the Auditor General.

Both of these reductions in wait lists coincide with a narrowing in the definition  in 2010 by the government of who is even allowed to join the wait-lists for long-term care.

So, it is, perhaps, not so surprising that the number of hospital patients waiting for LTC has declined.  Indeed, the Auditor General declared in his recent review of LTC placement that the decline in people waiting for LTC in 2011 was primarily due to the tightened restrictions (see page 191 of his review).  Since 2011, the decline in  community and hospital patients waiting for LTC has been modest.

While the decrease in the LTC wait list in both the hospitals and the community was significant (overall a 15% reduction), it was much more marked for patients waiting in hospitals for LTC  (which saw the eye-popping 41% reduction noted above).

Judging by results, the main goal was to get patients waiting for LTC out of hospital beds.

A little after these changes to long-term care, there was a sharp increase in the number of patients in hospital waiting for home care and assisted living, starting quite abruptly in July 2011 -- presumably as a result of changes in government policy, the narrowing of long-term care wait-lists included.

As a result of the increase in patients waiting for home care, or assisted living, the decline in ALC patients is not nearly so marked as you might expect given the decline in patients waiting for LTC.

From a little over 400 patients waiting for home care or assisted living in June 2011, that wait list increased to 900 hospital patients by March 2013.

Acute Care ALC patients: With the decline in the number of patients in hospital waiting for long-term care, there are now more patients in acute care hospital beds waiting for other forms of hospital services. Seven-hundred and sixty patients in these beds are waiting to move into long-term care facilities, while 798 are waiting for other, non-acute hospital services. 

Despite this, hospitals are often described as "not the best place" for Alternate Level of Care (ALC) patients. In fact, hospital ALC patients are often simply receiving the wrong sort of hospital service, or are in the wrong sort of hospital bed.

Most of the acute care patients in this ALC category are waiting for complex continuing care and rehabilitation -- hospital services, which as noted in the last post, are being cut.

Fewer acute care patients are waiting for home care or assisted living services.  Only 567 acute care patients are waiting for home care or assisted living, considerably less than the number waiting for other hospital services or LTC services.

Photo by Sal Falko

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…