Skip to main content

Union membership in Canada increases (despite claims otherwise)

The Globe and Mail (regurgitating in today's print edition claims from the Canadian Press) gets it wrong in a story about the labour movement and the new private sector union, UNIFOR.  They claim that "Union membership has declined in Canada in recent years".  In fact, as the easily available Statistics Canada chart copied below shows, union coverage has grown by 164,000 employees from 2008 to 2012, growing in 3 out of the last 4 years.

Union coverage
(Thousands)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Total employees, covered and not covered by union
Total employees, all industries 
14,464.30
14,124.40
14,371.20
14,635.80
14,841.10
Public sector
3,412.10
3,415.00
3,511.10
3,563.00
3,600.80
Private sector
11,052.20
10,709.40
10,860.20
11,072.70
11,240.30
Union coverage
Total employees, all industries
4,512.80
4,444.40
4,532.60
4,562.20
4,676.80
Public sector
2,530.50
2,541.40
2,629.90
2,638.60
2,684.20
Private sector
1,982.30
1,903.00
1,902.70
1,923.60
1,992.60
No union coverage
Total employees, all industries 
9,951.50
9,680.10
9,838.60
10,073.60
10,164.30
Public sector
881.6
873.6
881.2
924.4
916.6
Private sector
9,069.90
8,806.50
8,957.50
9,149.20
9,247.70

Stats Can CANSIM Chart 282-0078

Despite the recession, even private sector unionism grew by 10,300.

As a percentage of the workforce, union coverage has increased very slightly, from 31.2% in 2008 to 31.5% in 2012.

The media outlets also exaggerate the dominance of public sector unionization, claiming that "The public sector makes up the vast majority of union employees."  In fact public sector union membership made up 57% of union membership in 2012 with the private sector comprising 43%.

"Vast majority"? Hardly.

Perhaps they meant to point out the major difference in union density between public and private sector unionism  - that, at least, would be true (a much higher percentage of public sector workers are unionized compared to the percentage of private sector workers).   

Certainly it is true that bringing  private sector union density back to former levels is important for labour (and public sector workers have almost as much stake in that project as private sector workers). But the Globe and CP claim is quite misleading. 

Is it too much to ask the corporate-owned media to get the basics about unionism right?

Happy Labour Day and congratulations to UNIFOR for their founding convention.

Photo: Welcome to the new, large private sector union, UNIFOR, which was founded over the Labour Day weekend through the merger of CEP and CAW. Logo courtesy of nouveausyndicatdirect.ca




Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.







The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …