Skip to main content

Union membership in Canada increases (despite claims otherwise)

The Globe and Mail (regurgitating in today's print edition claims from the Canadian Press) gets it wrong in a story about the labour movement and the new private sector union, UNIFOR.  They claim that "Union membership has declined in Canada in recent years".  In fact, as the easily available Statistics Canada chart copied below shows, union coverage has grown by 164,000 employees from 2008 to 2012, growing in 3 out of the last 4 years.

Union coverage
(Thousands)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Total employees, covered and not covered by union
Total employees, all industries 
14,464.30
14,124.40
14,371.20
14,635.80
14,841.10
Public sector
3,412.10
3,415.00
3,511.10
3,563.00
3,600.80
Private sector
11,052.20
10,709.40
10,860.20
11,072.70
11,240.30
Union coverage
Total employees, all industries
4,512.80
4,444.40
4,532.60
4,562.20
4,676.80
Public sector
2,530.50
2,541.40
2,629.90
2,638.60
2,684.20
Private sector
1,982.30
1,903.00
1,902.70
1,923.60
1,992.60
No union coverage
Total employees, all industries 
9,951.50
9,680.10
9,838.60
10,073.60
10,164.30
Public sector
881.6
873.6
881.2
924.4
916.6
Private sector
9,069.90
8,806.50
8,957.50
9,149.20
9,247.70

Stats Can CANSIM Chart 282-0078

Despite the recession, even private sector unionism grew by 10,300.

As a percentage of the workforce, union coverage has increased very slightly, from 31.2% in 2008 to 31.5% in 2012.

The media outlets also exaggerate the dominance of public sector unionization, claiming that "The public sector makes up the vast majority of union employees."  In fact public sector union membership made up 57% of union membership in 2012 with the private sector comprising 43%.

"Vast majority"? Hardly.

Perhaps they meant to point out the major difference in union density between public and private sector unionism  - that, at least, would be true (a much higher percentage of public sector workers are unionized compared to the percentage of private sector workers).   

Certainly it is true that bringing  private sector union density back to former levels is important for labour (and public sector workers have almost as much stake in that project as private sector workers). But the Globe and CP claim is quite misleading. 

Is it too much to ask the corporate-owned media to get the basics about unionism right?

Happy Labour Day and congratulations to UNIFOR for their founding convention.

Photo: Welcome to the new, large private sector union, UNIFOR, which was founded over the Labour Day weekend through the merger of CEP and CAW. Logo courtesy of nouveausyndicatdirect.ca




Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.







The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…