Skip to main content

Physician payments increase 94%


There has been a sharp increase in the number of physicians in Ontario and an even sharper increase in payments to physicians.

Between 2008 and 2012 the number of physicians in Ontario has increased 18.5%.  This growth is offset by population growth only very modestly: the number of physicians per 100,000 population has increased 13.5% over the same period.




Ontario

Supply


2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
 Increase
Total Number of Physicians
23,043
24,515
25,044
26,163
27,300
18.5%

Family Medicine
11,106
11,817
12,170
12,815
13,513
21.7%

Specialists
11,937
12,698
12,874
13,348
13,787
15.5%
Physicians per 100,000 Population
177
187
188
195
201
13.6%
Location
Rural

1,149
1,202
1,216
1,281
1,352
17.7%

Urban

21,870
23,294
23,816
24,868
25,894
18.4%

Total clinical payments to physicians in Ontario over a similar period (2007/8 to 2011/12) have increased much more rapidly: fully 38%. Indeed, since the Liberal government came to power in 2003, the increase is an astonishing 94%. In the most recent year reported (2011-12), the increase was 9.6%.


Total Clinical Payments to Physicians
Ontario Increase
Ontario payments as % of Canadian
Fiscal Year
Ont.
Canada
($’000)
2003–2004
4,896,254
12,423,446

39.4%
2004–2005
5,169,037
13,036,428
5.6%
39.7%
2005–2006
5,766,526
14,068,859
11.6%
41.0%
2006–2007
6,226,168
14,783,971
8.0%
42.1%
2007–2008
6,881,816
16,064,328
10.5%
42.8%
2008–2009
7,751,544
17,676,543
12.6%
43.9%
2009–2010
8,229,822
19,080,485
6.2%
43.1%
2010–2011
8,674,215
20,242,064
5.4%
42.9%
2011–2012
9,506,125
22,068,826
9.6%
43.1%


The largest growth has been in alternative payments to physicians (as opposed to fee-for-service payments, which, until now, have been the norm). Since 2007/8, there has been a whopping 78.4% increase in alternative payment; since 2003/4, we have seen a 430% increase. 

Ontario now accounts for the majority of such "alternative" payments in Canada, with growth in these payments far outstripping other provinces. Indeed by 2011-12, Ontario paid the large majority (66%) of new Canadian annual alternative payments compared with 2003/4.


 Alternative Clinical Payments to Physicians
Fiscal Year
Ont.
Canada
Ontario Increase
Ontario as % of Canada
($’000)
2003–2004
780,111
2,407,743

32.4%
2004–2005
864,973
2,640,732
10.9%
32.8%
2005–2006
1,056,499
2,955,074
22.1%
35.8%
2006–2007
1,379,348
3,208,654
30.6%
43.0%
2007–2008
1,882,571
3,906,053
36.5%
48.2%
2008–2009
2,489,630
4,755,853
32.2%
52.3%
2009–2010
2,680,927
5,085,875
7.7%
52.7%
2010–2011
2,985,798
5,548,758
11.4%
53.8%
2011–2012
3,358,396
6,338,803
12.5%
53.0%
Source: CIHI,  National Physician Database, 2011-12 Data Release  



As Ontario has moved to more alternative payments, it has also assumed a larger share of total Canadian payments to physicians. That raises some question about the efficiency of Ontario's alternative funding mechanisms.

Earlier, the government made some noise about freezing physician incomes, but the 2013-14 Budget Estimates suggest that the line item primarily covering physicians ("Ontario Health Insurance") is going up quite a bit more than the rest of the health care budget, so the trend towards increased funding for Ontario physicians may be continuing. 

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.







The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…