Skip to main content

Ambulance offload delays at hospitals: one step forward (but two steps back)

EMS offload delay and 911 response time, Fire and EMS costs reported

Ambulances are spending a little less of their time offloading patients according to the 2012 Ontario Municipal Benchmark Initiative (OMBI) report.  

That is positive: time spent offloading patients to overcrowded hospitals could otherwise be spent responding more quickly to 911 emergency calls.  Nevertheless, we remain far behind where we were a few years ago.

The OMBI study reports EMS data for 12 large Ontario urban municipalities --and also Muskoka. It indicates:
  • The percentage of time spent in hospital Emergency Rooms (“offload delay”) has declined from 18.7% of total EMS time in 2011to 17.8% in 2012.  
  • However, this is the same percentage as in 2010 and is up significantly from 2009 when paramedics spent 16.7% of their time waiting in ERs. Indeed, in 2007 paramedics spent 15.4% of their time in hospital ERs, and in 2006 they spent 13.3% of their time in hospital ERs.  In other words, since 2006, paramedics are spending 1/3 more of their time in hospital offload delay.
  • The time it took to arrive for 90% of code 4 calls (the most serious calls measured from the time the call was received by EMS until the time an EMS unit arrives) is basically stable.  In 2012 it was 10 minutes and 34 seconds; this is down 7 seconds from 2011 but up 7 seconds from 2010.
  •  There was a 2.76% increase in 2012 in cost per hour of EMS service to $186 from $181 in 2011.  This increase is down from a 5.23% increase in 2011. (The 2010 cost was $172 per hour.)

The OMBI report also provides some information on firefighting.  However, the report covered only 7 Ontario municipalities in 2012 (and 8 Ontario municipalities in 2010 and 2011). It also includes data from Calgary.  As well, the study breaks out the data for rural areas in three of the reporting Ontario municipalities.
  •  Fire staffing hours per capita are stable:  0.53 in 2010, 0.55 in 2011, and .54 in 2012.  So, firefighting hours per capita are not declining over this period.
  • Fire deaths and injuries  per capita declined over the 2010-2012 period. Fire injuries improved from 5.66 per 100,000 per population in 2010 to 4.94 in 2012. Deaths improved from  0.58 per 100,000 population in 2010 to 0.39 in 2012.
  • There was also a decline in residential structural fires with losses per 1000 houses.   In urban areas the decline was from 0 .984 in 2010, to 0.901 in 2011, to 0.891 in 2012.  That is a 9.5% decline in two years.  In the 3 rural areas the reported the decline was from 1.548 per 1000 houses in 2010, to 1.057 in 2011, and 1.047 in 2012 -- an impressive 32.4% decline in two years.
  • Fire costs: front line fire vehicles per hour cost $293 in 2010, $305 in 2011 (a 4.1% increase), and $315 in 2012 (a 3.27% increase).    
  • Firefighting front line vehicle per hour costs are 69.4% higher than EMS vehicle per hour costs.  This is slightly down from 70.3% in 2010.  


Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…