Skip to main content

Hospital P3 scandal gets worse as Ontario Liberals and PCs say bring 'em on!

The public private partnership ("P3") hospital scandal in Montreal is getting even worse, if that is possible. 

As reported earlier, a police corruption investigation showed how SNC-Lavalin officials allegedly arranged payments of $22.5-million to McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) chief executive Arthur Porter and his side-kick Yanai Elbaz in exchange for ensuring SNC won the $1.3-billion contract. 

In total, eight people are facing charges and police describe this P3 as the "biggest construction fraud in the history of Canada".  Hospital CEO (and former Steven Harper Security Intelligence Review Committee chief) Arthur Porter is fighting Canada's attempts to bring him back home to face the charge: he had, rather conveniently, left the country.  

Now a senior SNC-Lavalin official has admitted that the company took design features from their competition when it became apparent their design was a flop. Someone within the McGill University Health Centre gave SNC a copy of the competition's architectural drawings, detailing a ward design favoured by  MUHC physicians. 

 Justice Charbonneau called SNC's actions illegal. 

Notably, SNC met directly with hospital officials in the middle of the bidding process: that is specifically forbidden to allow at least a degree of fairness in the competition.

SNC may wish to portray its scandals as from the past, but Charles Chebl, who was involved in the latest shenanigans was not disciplined – instead he got promoted and is now vice-president and head of construction at SNC. Charbonneau inquiry Commissioner Mr. Lachance noted that Mr. Chebl's career had not suffered. "After you have regularly cheated in such an important contract, instead of punishing you, they give you a promotion."

SNC-Lavalin is involved in Ontario P3s – indeed, just after the bribery scandal broke in December 2012, the Ontario McGuinty Liberal government awarded a consortia they are involved in an even bigger P3 contract -- the $2.1 billion P3 for the Ottawa LRT rapid transit project.

Despite all this, there is not the slightest sign that the Ontario Liberals will back off privatization of hospital clinical services or hospital P3s. As for the PCs, expect much worse: they see privatization as a miracle cure-all (up there with creating jobs by laying off 100,000 workers) .   

Notably, the Charbonneau Commission heard earlier that SNC deliberately went around Quebec's political party financing rules, leading to a flurry of donations to the governing Quebec Liberal Party in 2009. The donations came as the engineering firm was bidding on this very hospital P3 project

Photo: davehuehn, MUHC under construction


  1. Liberals and Conservative love triple-Ps, which is just privatization by stealth The wasted bliions of dollars in the e-Health and ORNGE scandals are a direct result of the Liberal's pro-privatization ideology.

  2. The NDP has also set up P3s when in office, e.g. in Ontario and Manitoba. Ontario's Highway 407, a gift to the private sector, was created by Ontario's NDP government in the 1990s. Manitoba's NDP government has set up several public-private partnerships.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…