Skip to main content

Ontario job creation falls well short of plan

100,000 new Ontario jobs per year forecast

If Ontario tries to cut its way to a balanced budget, weak employment figures suggest the cuts may have to get a whole lot worse.  Here's why.  

In the Budget, the government projected 100,000 job growth in 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017. That's an annual increase of about 1.4%. 

But the government is having a problem meeting its jobs target in 2014.  

Comparing the average of the first six months of 2013 with the first six of 2014 shows an increase from 6.861 million jobs to only 6.904 million.  That's only 43,000 new jobs over the year, an increase 0.65% -- less than half of the government's target.  

The Public Sector: Given sharp public sector austerity, the main brake on job creation has been public sector employment. 

Even without Tim Hudak, public sector employment has decreased between the first six months of 2013 and the first six months of 2014 by some 40,000 jobs.  

The good news is that the decline may be easing.  For the most recent month reported, June 2014, public sector jobs were down only 18,700 compared with June 2013.  Earlier in 2014 we were much further back:  in February 2014, Ontario had 57,300 fewer public sector jobs compared with one year earlier.

Public sector job losses holding back job growth in Ontario

Given the austerity both the provincial Liberal and federal Conservative governments propose, public sector jobs are likely to continue to be a brake on job creation.   

The Private Sector: There are some signs of life in private sector job creation, but not nearly enough to offset public sector austerity.  

Private sector employment has increased by 80,400 jobs, comparing the first six months of 2014 with the first six of 2013.  That is a 1.8% increase. Notably, however, for the most recent month reported, there was a loss of 49,600 private sector jobs –  a one month 1.1% drop in the number of private sector jobs.  

49,600 private sector job losses in June 2014 in OntarioSlow job growth and the impact on public services and public healthcare:  The recent provincial Budget was of course an election Budget  -- so it plans a larger funding increase than we have seen in recent years. A whopping 2.55% program funding increase is officially planned. In contrast, the previous three Budgets only increased program spending 4.1% in total. At an annual rate, that is about half the increase proposed in the election Budget .

Many voices for big business are now urging the government to return to a full on attack on public spending. 

Obligingly, the Ontario government’s spending plans for the following three years are extremely grim, much worse even than the three Budgets before the election Budget. A tiny 0.59% increase is proposed for next year, followed by 0.08% (yes  -- 8 one hundreds of one-percent) in 2016-17, followed by a spending cut of 0.67% in 2017-18 to balance the Budget.  In fact the plan is to spend exactly the same in 2017-18 as in 2014-15. 

With inflation and population growth, this means significant real cuts in programs. Even the Globe and Mail estimates this at a real spending cut of 3% per year.

The jobs and growth solution: One easy way out of such an unsettling picture for public sector services (and public sector workers) would be better than expected growth, and better than expected job growth.  

So far, that is not happening.  Quite the reverse.

Of course, it is early days yet.  We will see where the job and growth outlook goes in the months leading up to the next Budget

But without some improvement, even the draconian spending plans now in place may not be enough to balance the budget.

Cutting real public spending is the government's main strategy to end deficits. But it is coming with weaker than planned employment growth and that means we may fall short of the government's plan for revenue growth.  That will drive up the deficit and we are back to square one.  

What's the option then?

If jobs and growth fall short, other ways to deal with the deficit would be [1] more public spending cuts or [2] revenue increases or [3] simply putting off balancing the budget.  More on those options next week.

The full Statistics Canada numbers behind this employment report can be downloaded here.  



Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…