Skip to main content

Ontario falls 40% short of jobs target -- but deficit target may be met

Inflation is increasing in Ontario, while jobs and growth lag


Revenue prospects for this year:  An earlier post looked at poor job creation in Ontario and the impact that might have on obtaining the revenue goals the government has set for this year. 

Last week's jobs report for July was  dreadful on a Canada-wide basis.  But the report noted Ontario saw some pick up in July, with 15,100 new jobs overall. 


However, the job growth in July was all part-time; Ontario actually lost 29,300 full time jobs.  That is consistent with the pattern since July 2013: all the new jobs in Ontario have been part-time, while the number of full time jobs has shrunk 0.4%.  


Moreover, the first seven months of 2014 still average only 43,000 more jobs than the first seven months of 2013, less than half the Ontario government's goal of 100,000 new jobs in 2014.


Update: As widely reported, the Stats Can Labour Force Survey for July got it wrong.  The corrected report for Ontario provides some better news.  Instead of a 15,100 new jobs in Ontario, the  corrected release indicates 39,500 new jobs in July. Compared with one year earlier, the increase in employment is 60,300.  

That is more in line with the the Stats Can employment and average weekly earnings (“SEPH”) data which is more reliable but less timely than the Labour Force Survey data. The SEPH data indicates 62,600 new jobs for the first five months of 2014 compared with the same period last year.

Despite the improved news, even the new Labour Force Survey data indicates that almost all the new jobs are part time (52,000 out of 60,000).  Moreover, we are still almost 40% short of the government's 2014 target. 
 
Increasing inflation driving higher government revenue?  More promisingly -- for Ontario's revenue target -- is the rapid increase of inflation in Ontario. 

The Ontario government’s first quarter 2014 economic accounts came out  in July and Ontario’s nominal economic growth was up 1.1% over the quarter, well up from 0.2% in the fourth quarter of 2013.    

Nominal growth however is composed of both inflation and real growth and the growth we saw in the first quarter was mostly due to inflation. Economy-wide prices increased 0.9% and consumer prices increased 0.7% over the quarter. 

Real economic growth faded (due, they say, to a harsh winter) to a miserable 0.1% in the first quarter.

But, thanks to inflation, the annualized GDP in the first quarter of 2014 was $706.2 billion, a mere 1.5% short of the Budget target for the following fiscal year.  

Since the first quarter, Stats Canada reports that inflation has picked up in Ontario.  In June consumer inflation rose to 3% over the previous June in Ontario, the highest consumer inflation in Canada and double the rate forecast in the Ontario Budget for 2014. 

So higher than expected inflation is driving nominal economic growth.  Nominal economic growth is the key driver of government revenue, so, even with modest economic and job growth, this is a good sign that we will meet the Budget’s revenue forecast.

The good news: If this level of inflation continues, we are on track to exceed the Budget’s revenue goal, allowing the government to more easily meet their deficit target.

And the bad news: Higher inflation means that the government’s current spending plan will buy even fewer public services.  

As  a result, we will have to win increased spending in next year's Budget just to stop the cuts from becoming worse than already planned. 


Higher inflation also means the real wages of workers are falling more quickly, especially for workers (like many public sector workers) who will receive only modest wage adjustments.


Update 19 August:  The Ontario  Ministry of Finance has now confirmed that Ontario is on track to beat its deficit target.  

Photo: Simon Cunningham

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…