Skip to main content

Ontario Liberal funding plan is LESS than Harper's federal transfers

Federal transfers to Ontario 2015-16
The federal transfers are out for 2015/16 and Ontario has done well –$1.253 billion or 6.5% more than the total federal transfers to Ontario for 2014/15. 

Apparently, the Wynne government's attack on the Harper government's stingy cash transfers to Ontario are convincing the Conservatives to cough up some more dough for Ontario.  (Just in time for the federal election.)  

The total increase in federal transfers ($1.253 billion) equals a 1.1% increase in overall provincial program spending.  In contrast, the current provincial government spending plan is to increase program spending 0.6% next year, a tiny 0.08% the following year, and then impose a cut of 0.7% the year following that.  

In other words, federal Conservative transfer increases to the provincial government far outstrip total provincial Liberal spending plans.  Ontario "own source" revenue would play no role at all in new program spending.

This is very odd - -in the normal scheme of things federal transfers should make up only a small portion of the overall provincial program spending increase.  It is odder still when you considered that the extra cash is coming from a government that makes few pretenses about its interest in spending cash on programs that benefit working people.  The Ontario Liberals however won an election on defending public services -- there just isn't any funding from them to actually implement that policy it seems. 

Not yet anyway.   We will see if they keep to their hard, hard line line when the Budget rolls around in the new year. They certainly have a bit more cash from the Feds to help make change happen.  


Federal Health Transfers:  The health transfer is up $735 million or 5.95%.  That is $364 million more than it would have been if we had not won a two year extension to the 6% federal health transfer increases in the last federal election (and were instead already stuck with the 3% minimum increase that the Harper Conservatives plan).   

This $735 million federal health transfer represents about a 1.5% increase in total Ontario health care funding. 

Ontario needs to fight for federal health funding:  A Toronto Star  article on Charles Sousa and the federal transfers had not a word on fighting to improve the federal health transfers.   Likewise,  health care funding was largely passed over in media accounts of Kathleen Wynne's note  to Harper earlier this week either.  

Unless the Wynne government picks up their health care game,  Ontario will be stuck with a loss of an extra $364 million for health care every year. 

Federal Support to Ontario (millions of dollars)

2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
–2010
–2011
–2012
–2013
–2014
–2015
–2016
Canada Health Transfer2
9,722
10,141
10,673
11,328
11,980
12,356
13,091
Canada Social Transfer
4,205
4,332
4,463
4,577
4,709
4,843
4,986
Equalization
347
972
2,200
3,261
3,169
1,988
2,363
Total - Federal Support
14,274
15,446
17,335
19,166
19,858
19,187
20,440
Per Capita Allocation (dollars)
1,100
1,178
1,309
1,431
1,467
1,404
1,482
One-time recoverable payment of $150 million for 2011–12 not included.
CHT includes separate payments to Ontario in respect of the Canada Health Transfer for 2009-10 ($489 million) and 2010-11 ($246 million) to ensure Ontario receives the same CHT cash support as other Equalization-receiving provinces.
Photo: Chalmers Butterfield

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.







The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…